SSD usually last longer than HDDs right?
Yes, usually, they will. They wear out differently.
HDDs wear out mechanically usually, so home users and small business users get several years, typically, while big businesses get less per drive, due to so many drives being in servers suffering from lots of vibration from fans and other drives. Some likely suffer from RAM going bad, PSUs feeding them bad power, and latent controller problems, too, but there's no practical way to troubleshoot for those (you can only really tell w/ PSU, when PCs of the same series chew through HDDs quickly).
Typically, assuming the SSD firmware is fine, either a flash error or other electrical problem on the SSD will cause failure long before the flash has a chance to wear out, in a client system. The flash effectively wearing slow enough, typically, to last 10 years, 20 years, or more, will mean that such an SSD will be more likely to suffer a different kind of failure.
When or if you get out of the enthusiast bubble, you'll realize that all non-volatile storage devices should be treated as wear parts, and not to be trusted. Get some DBMS exposure, and you'll be jaded .
Anyway, having a toolbox is nice, I guess, but it's not something ever needs to stay running, and it's not really special, either. It primarily makes a few things you might want to do easier than without it. The drives work fine without it, though. I really don't get people complaining about it so much, when they can remove it, and solve their problems; or never install it in the first place, which will prevent them. I have no plans for my workstation's new 840 Pro to use anything but MSAHCI.sys, and maybe an occasional check w/ CrystalDiskInfo . That's just one more annoying thing to keep up with, and should not be necessary.