Sander Sassen
Junior Member
- Sep 21, 2005
- 2
- 0
- 0
Someone in our forums has a good perspective on all this and he worded it better than I could, so I'll quote him here as most people here make the same mistakes, please take his advice to heart, as he's right.
Regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com
The problem with most people is that they tend to not read a post fully, or an article fully, prior to making up their minds. And of course it is far easier to just believe the negative spin of some company than the lone individual that has exposed them to lie and cheat and start a smear campaign. Rest assured that I would also not be supportive of Sander's article if it indeed was meant to smythe ATI. He however discloses all the information he has and provided PRELIMINARY(!) benchmarks of a PREPRODUCTION(!) card that was NOT(!) tested by himself and he provided a DISCLAIMER(!) to me that just shows he's covered every base, no need to attack the person.
Frankly ATI has succeeded to spin the attention away from the scores mentioned in the article and on Sander as a person, which is a clear sign of bad ethics in my book. Andrzej Bania continues to this day to respin claims Sander has already PROVEN(!) false, yet people simply ignore this. Bania continues to smear Sander, ridicule him, whereas Sander has done everything he can to stay HONEST and OPEN about what happened. If you have not fully read his rebuttal following Andrzej Bania's post I frankly don't think you have the right to post here, or anywhere else, regarding this topic.
Again, keep up the good work Sander,
---
Jason Silverman
Regards,
Sander Sassen
http://www.hardwareanalysis.com