How is hawkishness in any way a moderate trait? Neocon is about using American military and economic power to spread American viewpoints and values around the globe. Without making any value judgments, that's not what I'd call a moderate viewpoint.
probably because they need something to stare at...after all, conservatives have
as opposed to
:awe:
Pictures of women are gay?
If McCain had won the 2008 election, and died in office (he is not a young man, after all) the thought of PALIN having the nuclear launch codes gives me chills.
Actually, it's quite possible, in this context. The person who made the image, along with those who regularly post it are possibly overcompensating for a feeling of lost bravado. Perhaps they even have latent homosexual tendencies.
Much in the same way that under-washed, unkempt "macho" men get all "sports sports, hyuk hyuk, check that bitch, I'd tap that" around each other, all the while slipping in subtle slaps on the back or ass. I've known two of them who eventually turned out to be decent, gay men.
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that, quite the opposite! However, being an asshole is a side effect of being uncomfortable with oneself.
Perhaps I'm just trying to push conservative buttons, you could imply, but I'm really not. There is something emotionally wrong with conservatives, and in many cases (priests going all bad-touch on people), it stops them from being comfortable with who they are and they wind up hurting people and/or acting like complete fuck-tards in the process.
Yes, I'm comparing conservative tough-guys to rapist-priests.
Why do the looks of women involved in politics keep being brought up on thiis forum?
Actually she didn't blame the oil spill on a cozy relationship with Obama but don't let the facts get in the way of a good Palin 2 minute hate session.
Actually, it's quite possible, in this context. The person who made the image, along with those who regularly post it are possibly overcompensating for a feeling of lost bravado. Perhaps they even have latent homosexual tendencies.
Much in the same way that under-washed, unkempt "macho" men get all "sports sports, hyuk hyuk, check that bitch, I'd tap that" around each other, all the while slipping in subtle slaps on the back or ass. I've known two of them who eventually turned out to be decent, gay men.
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that, quite the opposite! However, being an asshole is a side effect of being uncomfortable with oneself.
Perhaps I'm just trying to push conservative buttons, you could imply, but I'm really not. There is something emotionally wrong with conservatives, and in many cases (priests going all bad-touch on people), it stops them from being comfortable with who they are and they wind up hurting people and/or acting like complete fuck-tards in the process.
Yes, I'm comparing conservative tough-guys to rapist-priests.
Palin: Obama too close to BP
American Power: Sarah Palin on Barack Obama's BP Cash Pipeline
FOXNews.com - Palin Links BP Donations to Obama
Oil drilling enthusiast Sarah Palin slams tenuous Obama-BP ties
Palin: Where's the Media with the Obama-BP Connection
Palin accuses Obama of being in bed with Big Oil
Palin suggests connection between Obama's response to oil spill
Palin: Obama too close to BP
Palin Links BP Donations to Obama
Palin: Obama in Bed with Big Oil
Palin Links BP Donations to Obama to Explain Gulf Spill
I could go on but it might get a little redundant.
--
Probably because they need something to stare at...after all, conservatives have
Interestingly enough, I don't doubt that you think that. Because the liberal side of that story is that to justify hating conservatives, you need to vilify them first. But it's still empty drivel, it's still a refusal to face facts, it's still weak. Why not simply admit the truth? Why not announce that you hate conservatives and you want them silenced? I'd have more respect for that than some foolish pysco-babble bullshit. You sound like moonie.
Well - at least you recognize that you have the same "enlightened outlook on life and society" as do retarded people. Though I suspect that neutral onlookers might have trouble differentiating between the two groups . . .It's not hate, it's pity. These people are capable, but they don't do anything useful because of the way they've been programmed. Some are just more susceptible than others, and it has nothing to do with intellect, because I've met mentally retarded people with far more enlightened outlooks on life and society.
I'm sorry you're butt-hurt over it, but I did not lie, nor was this an attempt to build some kind of meaning behind my non-existent "hatred". I reserve "hate" for the ideas and consequences, not those who fall victim to them.
Well - at least you recognize that you have the same "enlightened outlook on life and society" as do retarded people. Though I suspect that neutral onlookers might have trouble differentiating between the two groups . . .
I think calling things "gay" is gay.
Did you say something?
Not that you'd understand, dude. You could find someone to explain it to you, but you'd miss the first part of Spongebob and you'd just be confused anyway.
A simple "no" would suffice. It would've saved you the 20+ minutes that it took you to type out a response.
Those "dumb voters" placed Obama in office.
It's not hate, it's pity. These people are capable, but they don't do anything useful because of the way they've been programmed. Some are just more susceptible than others, and it has nothing to do with intellect, because I've met mentally retarded people with far more enlightened outlooks on life and society.
I'm sorry you're butt-hurt over it, but I did not lie, nor was this an attempt to build some kind of meaning behind my non-existent "hatred". I reserve "hate" for the ideas and consequences, not those who fall victim to them.
JS: Why do you think the sides dont understand each other?
NW: Frankly, liberals are out of the habit of communicating with anyone outside their own in cohort. We have a cultural problem with self-righteousness and elitism. Liberals roll their eyes about going on "Oprah" to reach a mass audience by using language that anyone can understand even if you majored in semiotics at Yale. We look down on people we dont agree with. It doesnt serve us well.
but if people stopped giving her attention, she might go away.
look at her poll numbers, she's obviously not a credible GOP candidate for 2012.