Intel doesn't drop prices. The old i5's will disappear and be replaced by new ones at approximately the same price.
What's your use-case? An i5 is a lot faster, but the 6300 is adequate for most games.
Budget? Usage pattern?
I just feel as if I didn't really upgrade at all. I've been running Dolphin Emulator and it's still slow so maybe the processor sucks? Most games run great though, GTA4 though doesn't.
If you can return it then why not go with a FX-8320E OR the FX-8370E ~ http://www.anandtech.com/show/8429/amd-set-to-announce-new-fx-processorsI recently bought an FX-6300 and replaced my old Phenom II x4. Though now Intel is releasing new CPUs i'm debating whether to get an i5 or stick with the FX? I'm hoping Intel drops the price on existing i5s.
Dolphin will run considerably faster on an i3 or i5, so it would be a worthwhile upgrade, I think.
Yeah, iDunno. My gaming habits are casual at best.
I have an i5, but if I had a FX-6300, I'd probably be okay with it, although I might be tempted to do a mild OC for principle's sake.
What's the limitation - single-core performance? (Haven't used Dolphin.)
I recently bought an FX-6300 and replaced my old Phenom II x4. Though now Intel is releasing new CPUs i'm debating whether to get an i5 or stick with the FX? I'm hoping Intel drops the price on existing i5s.
I just feel as if I didn't really upgrade at all. I've been running Dolphin Emulator and it's still slow so maybe the processor sucks? Most games run great though, GTA4 though doesn't.
Well I usually make around 400$ every pay period (two weeks) but I put half in a savings account and half in my main account. I usually just game.
There are no new desktop chips coming out from Intel for at least a year. In any case, I think the op should just stay with the 6300. What he needs is faster single thread performance. Moving up to 8320 would gain very little, while 8350/70 would gain maybe 20%. Probably not worth it unless you can return the 6300 or sell it for close to what you paid.
Moving to Intel would require a new motherboard and CPU. Probably not worth it either unless performance is totally unacceptable with the 6300.
Edit: as leat said if you are solely focused on dolphin, the overclockable Pentium is a good choice.
Stick with the FX. It's a pretty decent chip; I'd spend the money elsewhere on the platform if you are not happy with your performance.
Its rubbish unless your workload is very (VERY) well threaded. Otherwise it fails everywhere else. Its also on an antique of a platform that is already in the cemetery. I remember I had a 6300 when I was playing Saint's Row 4 and the dips were enough to drive you insane.
Dolphin is EXTREMELY Intel-biased and only uses 1-2 threads. It needs raw speed.
I really doubt that it's Intel biased (ie checks cpuid and deliberately runs slower code path on non-Intel CPUs). It's an open source project, and that's something someone would have noticed and corrected.
It may use AVX / AVX2 though, I think.
Either way, it's extremely heavy on single-threaded performance, to the point that I think it takes a 9590 to even come close to a stock 4670K. If Dolphin is something you'll use often and you want to do it full speed 1080p+, you want an Intel CPU.I really doubt that it's Intel biased (ie checks cpuid and deliberately runs slower code path on non-Intel CPUs). It's an open source project, and that's something someone would have noticed and corrected.
Either way, it's extremely heavy on single-threaded performance, to the point that I think it takes a 9590 to even come close to a stock 4670K. If Dolphin is something you'll use often and you want to do it full speed 1080p+, you want an Intel CPU.
That said, overclocking does make a difference, so try that first OP.
EDIT: I just want to mention that the FAQ on the Dolphin website says that a stock 8350 is half as fast as a stock 4670K. That's even worse than I thought. There's clearly 0 optimization for AMD here.