Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
I liked the one I read a long time ago about ultra-low frequencies causing crowds to lose control of their bowels.
Originally posted by: Baked
Just order some arab drifters and you'll thin out the crowd.
Originally posted by: Czar
say hello to a new torture methood
lots of pain
no lasting effects
Originally posted by: chambersc
While no one is disputing the effectiveness of said weapon, where in the outlined words does it mention that it "kills all the people, doesn't destroy buildings?"Originally posted by: BoomerD
http://www.manuelsweb.com/neutronbomb.htm
"Also called ENHANCED RADIATION WARHEAD, specialized type of small thermonuclear weapon that produces minimal blast and heat but which releases large amounts of lethal radiation. The neutron bomb delivers blast and heat effects that are confined to an area of only a few hundred yards in radius. But within a somewhat larger area it throws off a massive wave of neutron and gamma radiation, which can penetrate armour or several feet of earth. This radiation is extremely destructive to living tissue. Because of its short-range destructiveness and the absence of long-range effect, the neutron bomb would be highly effective against tank and infantry formations on the battlefield but would not endanger cities or other population centres only a few miles away. It can be carried in a Lance missile or delivered by an 8-inch (200-millimetre) howitzer, or possibly by attack aircraft."
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: chambersc
While no one is disputing the effectiveness of said weapon, where in the outlined words does it mention that it "kills all the people, doesn't destroy buildings?"Originally posted by: BoomerD
http://www.manuelsweb.com/neutronbomb.htm
"Also called ENHANCED RADIATION WARHEAD, specialized type of small thermonuclear weapon that produces minimal blast and heat but which releases large amounts of lethal radiation. The neutron bomb delivers blast and heat effects that are confined to an area of only a few hundred yards in radius. But within a somewhat larger area it throws off a massive wave of neutron and gamma radiation, which can penetrate armour or several feet of earth. This radiation is extremely destructive to living tissue. Because of its short-range destructiveness and the absence of long-range effect, the neutron bomb would be highly effective against tank and infantry formations on the battlefield but would not endanger cities or other population centres only a few miles away. It can be carried in a Lance missile or delivered by an 8-inch (200-millimetre) howitzer, or possibly by attack aircraft."
OK, try this bit from Wiki:
"According to Cohen, one possible tactic of using such "true" neutron bombs is therefore to launch them as defensive weapons against armored attacks. Civilians enter fallout shelters, and the bomb is exploded 10 km over the armored attack. Portable armor is said to be unable to shield tank and aircraft crews. In such an event, a city's trees and grass would have been killed by radiation, but buildings would remain undamaged for the emerging civilians (who would however have to wait several days for certain short-lived isotopes to decay). "
The big "selling point to get funding back in the late 70's and early 80's for these was that fact. Granted, ANY large powerful blast in close proximity to buildings will destroy them, be it tthe A-bomb, the H-bomb, (Let's play Global Thermonuclear War!) massive amounts of TNT, or even a BIG propane tank! The neutron bomb was supposed to kill humans (and as "collateral damage" wildlive of all kinds) in the targeted area, (air-burst) while leaving the majority of buildings undamaged so that most of the population (not affected by the radiation) could inhabit them and also lower the rebuilding costs.
We just keep coming up with more and newer ways to kill each other.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: Trevelyan
Originally posted by: TheNinja
These were used in the Left Behind series of books. They basically started to boil the water in your body and if the beam stayed on you a long time you would die, but it was used to repel people or confuse them.
I don't think its the same thing... the weapon from that book would literally cook your insides. This thing only damages the top layer of skin due to the longer wavelenghts.
83% is absorbed by your skin. The rest goes to your muscles, organs, and BRAIN. Also, keep in mind that there is nothing protecting your cornea. Microwave radiation causes cataracts by heating the surface of your eyeball, and this won't be any different.
Non-lethal does not mean harmless.
Leaving the majority undamaged still means you could destroy a whole lot of buildings. A neutron bomb is still a critical mass and still an awfully big bang by most standards. Substantially weaker than most any modern nuclear weapon, but far far greater than any conventional weapon.Originally posted by: BoomerD
Originally posted by: chambersc
While no one is disputing the effectiveness of said weapon, where in the outlined words does it mention that it "kills all the people, doesn't destroy buildings?"Originally posted by: BoomerD
http://www.manuelsweb.com/neutronbomb.htm
"Also called ENHANCED RADIATION WARHEAD, specialized type of small thermonuclear weapon that produces minimal blast and heat but which releases large amounts of lethal radiation. The neutron bomb delivers blast and heat effects that are confined to an area of only a few hundred yards in radius. But within a somewhat larger area it throws off a massive wave of neutron and gamma radiation, which can penetrate armour or several feet of earth. This radiation is extremely destructive to living tissue. Because of its short-range destructiveness and the absence of long-range effect, the neutron bomb would be highly effective against tank and infantry formations on the battlefield but would not endanger cities or other population centres only a few miles away. It can be carried in a Lance missile or delivered by an 8-inch (200-millimetre) howitzer, or possibly by attack aircraft."
OK, try this bit from Wiki:
"According to Cohen, one possible tactic of using such "true" neutron bombs is therefore to launch them as defensive weapons against armored attacks. Civilians enter fallout shelters, and the bomb is exploded 10 km over the armored attack. Portable armor is said to be unable to shield tank and aircraft crews. In such an event, a city's trees and grass would have been killed by radiation, but buildings would remain undamaged for the emerging civilians (who would however have to wait several days for certain short-lived isotopes to decay). "
The big "selling point to get funding back in the late 70's and early 80's for these was that fact. Granted, ANY large powerful blast in close proximity to buildings will destroy them, be it tthe A-bomb, the H-bomb, (Let's play Global Thermonuclear War!) massive amounts of TNT, or even a BIG propane tank! The neutron bomb was supposed to kill humans (and as "collateral damage" wildlive of all kinds) in the targeted area, (air-burst) while leaving the majority of buildings undamaged so that most of the population (not affected by the radiation) could inhabit them and also lower the rebuilding costs.
We just keep coming up with more and newer ways to kill each other.
Originally posted by: xXped0thugXx
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
I want a keychain version!
thats what im saying, how practical is this thing, unless its in a keychain or can be attached to a rifle not sure how well it will work.