Matt1970
Lifer
- Mar 19, 2007
- 12,320
- 3
- 0
The arrogance of the leftists in charge of government at the time, under the tutelage of Obama the guy whose idea of leading was to say "we won", felt that they had the economy fixed. Knowing deep within their psyche's that throwing money at a problem always fixes it (yeah, we know otherwise) they threw money at the economy, put a check mark next to it declaring it fixed and moved on to the next item on the list. And although I used the word arrogance earlier it does not fully explain their actions. To paraphrase that same guy I quoted before, 'they acted stupidly'. Acted from a position based in a lack of knowledge and understanding and with zero intent of learning. The 'smartest guy in the room' felt he already knew the answer and governing as he did and still does today, it became so. Then and now, few if any are willing to tell the emperor he is naked and not clothed in finery.
This is at the heart of the arguments being heard regarding Schumer's statement. Nobody likes to act in a stupid fashion - and have it discovered. When your mistakes start to glaringly define your core beliefs people have a tendency to go on the defensive. Mistakes of this magnitude can change the course of a nation. It's potentially 'a big fucking deal'.
I still feel that Schumer has got an alternative agenda. On the surface it appears unnecessary to admit the mistake at this point. It's two years before the next election. Unless Schumer feels the party is that heavily damaged such that he needs to start some form of damage control this early I can think of no other reason for him to say what he's said. He appears to be a lone wolf in this endeavor so maybe it's just a case of senility is setting in. The only election that requires planning on this level two years out is a presidential one and that possibility is food for thought.
Damage control seems quite plausible. Schumer is attaching himself to whatever he thinks will gain points for him. It's pretty smart at this point publically.