Science supports the idea that girls with tattoos are sluttier, have less foresight, are more selfish and crazier, but it is not just cold-blooded scientists and ROK readers who feel this way: a fairly recent study had male and female undergraduates from the UK rate female line drawings that varied in eight levels of tattooing. Results showed that tattooed women were rated as less physically attractive, more sexually promiscuous, and heavier drinkers than untattooed women, with more negative ratings with increasing number of tattoos.
This seems about as legit as your Local News proclaiming everything Causes/Cures Cancer.
Yeah, this smells like bullshit. I looked at one of the studies and it to say it supported the conclusion for which it was cited is a stretch. I wouldn't be surprised if that's a recurring theme with this author.
Kim, 1991 - done on Korean males not females and not Westerners. And the only line in the abstract that supports the "impulsiveness" conclusion is this one.Which study did you look at?
That and huge stretch ear and septum piercingI've seen some beautiful women out there with tattoos that really ruin there amazing look. That shit is forever and most tat's look really bad.
I know this one woman who has beautiful white skin and half of it is covered in tats. They're very nice artistic tats that flow together so it's very tasteful - or as tasteful as a tat can be. But has such beautiful skin it seems like a crime to ink it over. It's like painting graffiti on the Sistine Chapel.I've seen some beautiful women out there with tattoos that really ruin there amazing look. That shit is forever and most tat's look really bad.
I know this one woman who has beautiful white skin and half of it is covered in tats. They're very nice artistic tats that flow together so it's very tasteful - or as tasteful as a tat can be. But has such beautiful skin it seems like a crime to ink it over. It's like painting graffiti on the Sistine Chapel.
I know this one woman who has beautiful white skin and half of it is covered in tats. They're very nice artistic tats that flow together so it's very tasteful - or as tasteful as a tat can be. But has such beautiful skin it seems like a crime to ink it over. It's like painting graffiti on the Sistine Chapel.
But correlation proves causation.
Saw "returnofkings" domain and women referred to as "sluttier" and didn't need to read the article to know without a doubt you are a complete idiot.
I've seen some beautiful women out there with tattoos that really ruin there amazing look. That shit is forever and most tat's look really bad.
Would you put a bumper sticker on a Ferrari?
When someone has a ton of tattoo's, they probably care more about what people think of them because someone that tatted up wants to try to look different and make a statement of how you should think of them. When you're putting something that far out there, you want people to look.Maybe girls that are less likely to care what others think of them are more likely to get tattoos and more likely to please their own sexual desires?
Saw "returnofkings" domain and women referred to as "sluttier" and didn't need to read the article to know without a doubt you are a complete idiot.
Return Of Kings is a blog for heterosexual, masculine men. Its meant for a small but vocal collection of men in America today who believe men should be masculine and women should be feminine.
ROK aims to usher the return of the masculine man in a world where masculinity is being increasingly punished and shamed in favor of creating an androgynous and politically-correct society that allows women to assert superiority and control over men. Sadly, yesterdays masculinity is todays misogyny. The site intends to be a safe space on the web for those men who dont agree with the direction that Western culture is headed. If you are new, check out our top 35 posts of all time.
Women and homosexuals are strongly discouraged from commenting here.
From the "about" link at the domain:
Yeah, I can see how you got there