KarenMarie
Elite Member
- Sep 20, 2003
- 14,372
- 6
- 81
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Those who are saying there is no evidence - we can't be absolutely sure. We were not in that courtroom for all this time like the jurors were. They are probably a little more informed than we are on the subject. And in order for a conviction they have to ALL be in agreement. Apparently they were, so that's 12 people who know a lot more than us who found him guilty. I'll believe the justice system on this one.
Eventually there were 12 jurors in agreement.
The first juror to be dismissed was definately for the not guilty side. He has stated so on every media outlet he has milked his 15 minutes of fame from.
We have no idea what the lawyer/doctor thought. Given that he is a lawyer and knows about the law on lack of physical evidence, the lack of motive, the lack of cause of death and that lack of murder weapon... combined with whatever his medical training taught him, I would think there is no way he would have convicted. It is my opinion that he was leaning to not guilty, but that is purely speculation on my side.
Then there was the next juror to be tossed out... why? Rumor has it that it was because that juror was doing her own research on the law, which they said is not allowed.
The only thing that they did have, which was not easily explained was the fact that no shoes belonging to Lacie seemed to be missing. Everything else had an explaination... whether the explaination was reasonable or not... I dont know.
I do want to say, however, that Amber was the biggest joke in the world... what a loser she is. She has a history of dating married men... has two children by two separate father and has been married to neither. She had like TWO dates with Scott and all of a sudden, it was the romance of the century. And I am not fooled by the hours and hours of taped phone calls... Anyone listening to more than five minutes of that can be sure he knew he was being taped. And why is it that everyone tied to the case has a gag order, except the loudmouth Gloria Alred? She was allowed to go on teevee every night and offer inside opinion.
Lookit, I think he did it. I think he is guilty as sin itself. I do not think, however, that he had a fair trial... and I do not think that the state proved it's case. It is easy to build a circumstancial case against anyone for any thing if they have enough man power and money to do so.
No time, place, cause of death. No murder weapon. No motive. No physical evidence.