He also removed it as an issue republican party candidates can lose to democratic candidates on. Now there are no anti-gay marriage propositions that can pull out voters who will vote against conservatives.
What used to be a wedge issue that worked for conservatives very recently became one that works against them and now it is a non-issue since a conservative candidate can point to the SCOTUS and say "I can't do anything about it. but let's talk about taxes."
One could see a similar calculation in Chief Justice Robert's mind when that decision came down. Conservative politicians won't have to face voters in their states who lost their subsidies to help them afford health care.
Also take a look at what happened to health related stocks after the recent SCOTUS decision on the ACA.
.....
Oh no you di'n't!well yeah... the sucking is the whole reason I need to lock it down and put a ring on him.
lol Still would have been tax fraud though. Not a nice thing.Too bad this didn't come out 15 years ago, could've 'married' my roommate and we could've saved close to a $100,000 between the two of us over the 5 years we lived together lol. The marriage license cost and the cheap divorce is much cheaper than the $50,000+ more in taxes I had to pay as a single male. (AMT hits really hard when you're single and earn $200,000 as it negates large amounts of deductions instantly)
PS we also weren't in a 'civil union' type of state lol
You make a point, but that is dependent on Republican candidates being smart enough to recognize this gift. Were I a betting man, my money would be on "promises to fight on" for the majority of them.He also removed it as an issue republican party candidates can lose to democratic candidates on. Now there are no anti-gay marriage propositions that can pull out voters who will vote against conservatives.
What used to be a wedge issue that worked for conservatives very recently became one that works against them and now it is a non-issue since a conservative candidate can point to the SCOTUS and say "I can't do anything about it. but let's talk about taxes."
One could see a similar calculation in Chief Justice Robert's mind when that decision came down. Conservative politicians won't have to face voters in their states who lost their subsidies to help them afford health care.
Also take a look at what happened to health related stocks after the recent SCOTUS decision on the ACA.
.....
Huge win for divorce lawyers.
I feel like gay divorces should be relatively simple.
-less likelihood for kids to be involved
-because of above, less reason for one of the spouses to give up their careers and become a housewife/husband
-similar earning potentials
Divorce (of a real marriage gay or straight haha) is never simple. The gay community is now going to also enjoy the hell heteros go through. I had a cousin who had sorts of crap come up in her divorce even though they never had kids and both worked with similar incomes. The brown stuff always manages to hit the fan.
We are missing the toaster lover's take on this. To bad he had to go and get banned.
Divorce (of a real marriage gay or straight haha) is never simple. The gay community is now going to also enjoy the hell heteros go through. I had a cousin who had sorts of crap come up in her divorce even though they never had kids and both worked with similar incomes. The brown stuff always manages to hit the fan.
I try my best to fill that gap. :\
He also removed it as an issue republican party candidates can lose to democratic candidates on. Now there are no anti-gay marriage propositions that can pull out voters who will vote against conservatives.
What used to be a wedge issue that worked for conservatives very recently became one that works against them and now it is a non-issue since a conservative candidate can point to the SCOTUS and say "I can't do anything about it. but let's talk about taxes."
.....
As opposed to spreading to polygamy. There is no case for gay marriage that doesn't equally support group marriage. The difference is their degree of acceptance, and as we saw with gay marriage, that can change in the space of 10 years.
All true conservatives should rejoice with this ruling, as the principle that says the government should have no power over behavior between consenting adults and over who consenting adults may marry is greater than any personal feelings of homosexuality.
That the principle allows others freedoms you may not agree with is the whole point, and whether you agree or not is of no importance frankly.
I feel like gay divorces should be relatively simple.
-less likelihood for kids to be involved
-because of above, less reason for one of the spouses to give up their careers and become a housewife/husband
-similar earning potentials
All true conservatives should rejoice with this ruling, as the principle that says the government should have no power over behavior between consenting adults and over who consenting adults may marry is greater than any personal feelings of homosexuality.
That the principle allows others freedoms you may not agree with is the whole point, and whether you agree or not is of no importance frankly.
All true conservatives should rejoice with this ruling, as the principle that says the government should have no power over behavior between consenting adults and over who consenting adults may marry is greater than any personal feelings of homosexuality.
That the principle allows others freedoms you may not agree with is the whole point, and whether you agree or not is of no importance frankly.
Oh hell no. You get the full equality treatment, the divorce industry won't streamline the process and costs for gay divorce I am sure.
No 1040EZ version of gay divorce! What is interesting is the dynamics in traditional divorce and family court of male vs. female and if gay divorce will bring to light some of the bias that has grown into divorce proceedings.
Lesbian divorce is going to be really hard on the court as they end up wanting to award alimony to both parties.
Me, too. I expected Roberts to also go with the majority. Yet his dissent was super-vehement. Go figure.Not the least bit surprised. I'm surprised it was 5-4, not 6-3.
Oh hell no. You get the full equality treatment, the divorce industry won't streamline the process and costs for gay divorce I am sure.
No 1040EZ version of gay divorce! What is interesting is the dynamics in traditional divorce and family court of male vs. female and if gay divorce will bring to light some of the bias that has grown into divorce proceedings.
The gays are still mentally ill people just like your local pedophiles and the village tranny.
Bigoted sentiments like this are unwelcome here.
Perknose
Forum Director