Originally posted by: elph
Doing this is what is known in contract law as fraud. Have fun.
Is that a fact, or is that just your opinion? If fact...well I've yet to hear anyone get arrested or receive some kind of citation for doing so (trying to pull off something like this Seagate PM deal, not just in general). Yeah, I can see it now--CC siccing their lawyers on every single one of us because we were attempting to pull off contract fraud with this deal...
Anyways...CC denied my pricematch attempt, giving the same lame excuse (our after-rebate price is lower than BB's sale price). This is a bogus excuse which reeks of hypocrisy--CC won't PM against a competitor's
after-rebate price, which is fair since this is stated in their PM policy ("It does not apply to special offers or promotions, including rebates, free-with-purchase offers and special financing"). However, CC has no problem factoring in
their own after-rebate price when comparing against a competitor's lowest price--and there's nothing in CC's PM policy that states or implies whether they can or can't do this) in attempting to validate a PM. When I pointed this out to a CS phone rep and asked him if anyone on his end could explain this "discrepancy", neither he nor any of his immediate supervisors could adequetely do so--even their answers contradicted each other. One guy told me "We don't PM if any rebates are involved" (if that was indeed true, then why reject my PM attempt because CC after-rebate price turned out to be lower); another told me "We PM against the competitor's pre-rebate price" (fair, although this technically goes against their stated PM policy involving rebates, and is of course contradictory to the policy stated by the first guy); and a third person basically implied "We won't do it (PM our pre-rebate price against competitor's sale price) because that's just the way it is"...which I interpreted to mean "We can reject your PM because we said so". You know what's even more silly? This is just pure speculation on my part, but if CC's after-rebate price was still higher than the competitor's sale price...I betcha CC would still reject the PM attempt, giving another one of their lame contradictory excuses as to why they rejected it.
Note--I'm no lawyer, so my interpretation of CC's PM policy is just that--
my interpretation...so if someone more knowledgeable can accurately break down the meaning of their PM policy, I'm all ears...
I don't really expect to get this deal to work; at this point, I just want someone at CC to be able to adequately point out to me exactly how/why CC can get away with using their after-rebate price to invalidate a PM. The fact that apparently no one at their customer service center could give me a straight answer shows (for now) that CC does what it does because it can--even if they can't explain why, and that they don't really care if you don't like it.