Originally posted by: diab10
Does seagate give 5 years warranty? Cos my retailer argues with me and says its "only" three
Originally posted by: Cheezeit
not as quiet as WDs in the newer drives. look in storage review's latest review.
WDs have better performance
right now, i would get a wd as theres some pretty hot deals in the HD fourm.
but if the prices were the same, i would go seagate because of the warenty
Originally posted by: w00t
Originally posted by: Cheezeit
not as quiet as WDs in the newer drives. look in storage review's latest review.
WDs have better performance
right now, i would get a wd as theres some pretty hot deals in the HD fourm.
but if the prices were the same, i would go seagate because of the warenty
Hitachi beats WD but there is moving parts in a hd and when u have one running faster what do u think is gonna happen. all hd fail they have moving parts its like dlp color wheel for t.v's
Originally posted by: Cheezeit
Originally posted by: w00t
Originally posted by: Cheezeit
not as quiet as WDs in the newer drives. look in storage review's latest review.
WDs have better performance
right now, i would get a wd as theres some pretty hot deals in the HD fourm.
but if the prices were the same, i would go seagate because of the warenty
Hitachi beats WD but there is moving parts in a hd and when u have one running faster what do u think is gonna happen. all hd fail they have moving parts its like dlp color wheel for t.v's
what?
that makes no sense, they all run at 7200. and if ur talking seek times, then lol, tell me if you ever have a hd die on u because it seeked faster than another one.
Originally posted by: w00t
Originally posted by: Cheezeit
Originally posted by: w00t
Originally posted by: Cheezeit
not as quiet as WDs in the newer drives. look in storage review's latest review.
WDs have better performance
right now, i would get a wd as theres some pretty hot deals in the HD fourm.
but if the prices were the same, i would go seagate because of the warenty
Hitachi beats WD but there is moving parts in a hd and when u have one running faster what do u think is gonna happen. all hd fail they have moving parts its like dlp color wheel for t.v's
what?
that makes no sense, they all run at 7200. and if ur talking seek times, then lol, tell me if you ever have a hd die on u because it seeked faster than another one.
the Hitachi has a higher burst read speed the Hitachi is faster go look at benchies. seagate may be reliable and quite but they are average for speed.
Originally posted by: diab10
I cant decide between two HDD`s - SEAGATE Barracuda serial ATA 7200.7 Plus 120 GB NCQ, 7.200 o/min., 8 MB cache, Model: ST3160827AS or WD 120 GB SATA (with no further details). Mainboard is Epox 8kda3j (754) so NCQ doesnt mean much to me.
Originally posted by: AnnihilatorX
I can never hear my WD HDD so I don't actually know why you guys say WD is loud.
The newer drives with FBR should be even quieter
Originally posted by: Googer
Originally posted by: AnnihilatorX
I can never hear my WD HDD so I don't actually know why you guys say WD is loud.
The newer drives with FBR should be even quieter
They have Raptors is why. My Hitachi is just as quiet as a Solid State Drive.