Yes.
What news publications do you believe to be true?
:roll: Yeah, that's what we want, we want our government to determine who can have "press priviliges" and who can't. I'm sure that would do wonders for democracy. Moron.
I have asked PokerGuy many times what sources he believes are credible, he has always absolutely refused to answer. The reason for that isn't exactly mysterious, haha.
I don't automatically believe any news publications to be true, I just consider the source when you read any news from any source. I consider BBC for example to be more likely to be true than most other outlets. Sure, they have their bias like any other source, but the are less likely to lie. Same for CSM.
"This is a White House engaging in its own version of the media enemies list," Rove said. "And it's unhelpful for the country and undignified for the president of the United States to so do."
Yet the WH barred BBC from entering the babble.
THE BBC.
Or did you not read when i posted the list above?
Even Nixon faced the press. It's incredible how far the conservative moment has fallen. Wow.If you want to live under a regime of state-run media, then move to Russia. I'm sure you'll feel right at home.
Otherwise, your 'fake news' and 'political agenda' rhetoric is just codespeak for government censorship and suppression of the free press.
There have been 44 Presidents before Trump that had to deal with the media, and they all seemed to get through it.
Huh? I just posted a couple of examples, as I have many times in the past. Drinking so early?
Please see post #68.
When obummer tried to do the same thing to fox, other networks / news organizations did in fact at that point band together and said they would not stand for fox getting excluded and they forced the white house to back down.
I'm sure you were equally outraged when obummer was doing it to fox?
It's just like David Frum's article in the AtlanticThe fascist propaganda efforts continue. Realize this: The mainstream media is now the only voice that is actually proven to be independant and free from our government.
The right wing is actually proving it has lied all along about the media by it's own fascist actions and has vindicated the media at large in just one short month.
Only allowing in approved propaganda outlets is one of the most disturbing things to happen in the history of United States politics. How many cues does this man have to take from historical dictators like Hitler (Hitler did this very thing) before you finally admit this man is a clear and present danger to our freedoms?
If you claim to be against government control of the media and for a smaller government, you must oppose Trump's actions here. Any other stance is pure hypocrisy and you are, in reality, a big government authoritarian, and not a small government conservative.
Those citizens who fantasize about defying tyranny from within fortified compounds have never understood how liberty is actually threatened in a modern bureaucratic state: not by diktat and violence, but by the slow, demoralizing process of corruption and deceit. And the way that liberty must be defended is not with amateur firearms, but with an unwearying insistence upon the honesty, integrity, and professionalism of American institutions and those who lead them. We are living through the most dangerous challenge to the free government of the United States that anyone alive has encountered. What happens next is up to you and me. Don’t be afraid. This moment of danger can also be your finest hour as a citizen and an American.
The fascist propaganda efforts continue. Realize this: The mainstream media is now the only voice that is actually proven to be independant and free from our government.
The right wing is actually proving it has lied all along about the media by it's own fascist actions and has vindicated the media at large in just one short month.
Only allowing in approved propaganda outlets is one of the most disturbing things to happen in the history of United States politics. How many cues does this man have to take from historical dictators like Hitler (Hitler did this very thing) before you finally admit this man is a clear and present danger to our freedoms?
If you claim to be against government control of the media and for a smaller government, you must oppose Trump's actions here. Any other stance is pure hypocrisy and you are, in reality, a big government authoritarian, and not a small government conservative.
Where did you get that idea?I thought the MSM was proven to be in collusion with Clinton/DNC in trying to create the government.
And what stories are fake and misleading? Care to share what you think falls into that category? Do you ever take up this complaint with organizations like "The Washington Times" or "Breibart"?It's probably not the best idea to start excluding news outlets, but more and more News outlets seems to think the 1st Amendment is some kind of mandate for them to operate with impunity in their quest to shape and control public opinion with false and misleading news stories. They are becoming glorified political op-ed pieces operating under the guise of free press.
I thought the MSM was proven to be in collusion with Clinton/DNC in trying to create the government.
Transcription of that Politico interview with Sean Spicer from December 16th 2016:https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4658334/spicer
Poor Spicer, must have buckled when Trump filled his diaper and asked for a safe space.
Here is your response from when that happened.
Your response this time? "Obama did It". There may be other hypocrites as well but you are most definitely one of them.
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/white-house-steps-up-attacks-on-fox-news.332674/
Transcription of that Politico interview with Sean Spicer from December 16th 2016:
Oh snap? No reply?
That is an incredible contrast.