So you pick the one with the biggest tits.You read stories from the full spectra of the media and then make a call based on experience.
Just standard press pool coverage, it was OK for Obama, but now you get butt hurt over it. The difference? He excluded Fox and the right.What a bullshit way to avoid tough questions. Just make sure there's nobody in the room to ask them.
Post-truth all the way, Baby!
I consider few sources legitimate. Nowadays, I generally just listen to Mark Levin since the MSM and most other outlets are corrupt, and I prefer logic over slanted opinion in the knowledge I gain.
Just standard press pool coverage, it was OK for Obama, but now you get butt hurt over it. The difference? He excluded Fox and the right.
According to The New York Times: “Fox’s television news competitors refused to go along with a Treasury Department effort on Thursday [October 22, 2009] to exclude Fox from a round of interviews with the executive-pay czar Kenneth R. Feinberg that was to be conducted with a ‘pool’ camera crew…”. Fox News Channel’s James Rosen reported this backlash forced the Obama administration to reconsider its position on the matter: “The Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV news network consulted and decided that none of them would interview Feinberg unless Fox was included, and the administration relented…,” reported Rosen. Ultimately, after other media representatives objected, Fox News Channel was allowed to participate in the interviews
No, facts have no bias at all, but liberals are biased.Yes, facts have a liberal bias.
In pool reporting some outlets are always excluded, it's what makes it "pool reporting"Except it never actually happened. Even the most unfriendly sources acknowledge that to be true-
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...ite-house-attacked-excluded-fox-news-channel/
Trump did it anyway, excluding a lot more outlets than just Fox in the process.
Except it never actually happened. Even the most unfriendly sources acknowledge that to be true-
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...ite-house-attacked-excluded-fox-news-channel/
Trump did it anyway, excluding a lot more outlets than just Fox in the process.
This will quickly become the norm if the press does not now band together and demand equal and fair access by all. I have faith that the media will fight this off the right way (mass boycott).
If you had read jhhnn's story you'd see that it said President Obama's administration attempted the same thing to FOX.This.
You seem to like FOX there Taj.
If you had read jhhnn's story you'd see that it said President Obama's administration attempted the same thing to FOX.
I think this is absurd and dangerous by Trump and something we should all be against. I also think the "fake news" fiasco is something the left brought upon themselves by advocating for censorship when it fits their agenda.
If you had read jhhnn's story you'd see that it said President Obama's administration attempted the same thing to FOX.
If you had any comprehension whatsoever you can see I agreed with it, but it still did not happen.
I think this is absurd and dangerous by Trump and something we should all be against. I also think the "fake news" fiasco is something the left brought upon themselves by advocating for censorship when it fits their agenda.
The media only brought it upon itself by using the term "fake news". They should have used terms with less ambiguity, like calling the fake stories what they really were - hoaxes. I didn't see the big call for censorship in the media - more a concern on how to combat the rise of viral, directed misinformation campaigns propagated by both foreign entities and people looking to make a quick buck on the backs of rubes. Some people have become so partisan, they're willing to accept any absurd story if it helps "their side". There are some fine exhibits in this very thread.I think this is absurd and dangerous by Trump and something we should all be against. I also think the "fake news" fiasco is something the left brought upon themselves by advocating for censorship when it fits their agenda.
He doesn't, as evidenced by his posts.So how do you know anything?
I hope it continues and that this is not just a one time event.
Because the Obama Admin unsuccessfully messed with Fox once back in 2009?
Victim blaming at its finest.
They are the elite and privileged part of the media that wants their special treatment to continue from an administration that they're not being honest about.Of course you do, you have no integrity and are rather piteously predictable.