I always take that as a compliment coming from terminally stupid people. Thanks!
Can you link me up to your posts of outrage when obummer was doing the same thing?
Fake news organizations are being excuded.... whaaaaaaaaaaaah.
Notice how I'm not the one whining about what's happening, you are.
It seems like we're in a hopeless situation. We either get extremely corrupt corporate media or we get extremely corrupt state media. The Fox News channel isn't even legal in Canada because there's some kind of law against fake news.state sponsored television, coming to a dictatorship near you.
That was my point. obummer did the exact same thing earlier, and the other news organizations banded together to not tolerate. I didn't hear any outcry from the lefties about tyranny, destruction of free press and all that drivel then. When Trump does it, oh boy, that's different because.... reasons.
CNN is not a fake news organization you ignorant, pre-evolved gelatinous soup.
We'll ignore the ignorance of this position, and just focus on your lack of concern that Breitbart was included while CNN was excluded, if they are both fake news and the purpose is to exclude fake news. Or are you intellectually honest enough to admit that it really is about punishing dissent.They are pretty much both fake news at this point, neither can be trusted and both have a political agenda. Only one is open about its agenda.
waaaaaaaaah, CNN is being treated by Trump the way Fox was treated by obummer. whaaaaaaah, tyranny, whaaaaaaah free press destroyed.... whaaaaaaaah! And yes, they are fake news.
Snowflakes unite
Props for creative insult
You're going to have to specify which "lefties" you're referring to and post up some proof of your allegation.
You're going to have to specify which "lefties" you're referring to and post up some proof of your allegation.
If you want to live under a regime of state-run media, then move to Russia. I'm sure you'll feel right at home.They are pretty much both fake news at this point, neither can be trusted and both have a political agenda. Only one is open about its agenda.
You're expecting me to prove a negative? obummer tried to do the same thing. No whining about tyranny and destruction of the press from our lefties. Now Trump does it and it's the end of the world?
This you, buttercup?
I'm so sick of this 'but Obama!' hypocrisy. If it was wrong when(if) Obama did it, then it's wrong now.but but but but Obama!
do you ever get tired of being a whiny little snowflake?
It seems like we're in a hopeless situation. We either get extremely corrupt corporate media or we get extremely corrupt state media. The Fox News channel isn't even legal in Canada because there's some kind of law against fake news.
Do any real news sources exist? It's insane how many times we've caught the media lying. Remember the time they tried a start a race war by calling Zimmerman white, editing his phone calls, etc? In theory, the best news outlet should win the most viewers, but that's not how humans operate. We look for news that confirms our existing bias. A news station that reports reality would be disliked by everyone.
The difference being, the Obama administration had concerns about inaccurate facts being published, whereas the Trump administration simply labels any facts they don't like as fake news.When obummer tried to do the same thing to fox, other networks / news organizations did in fact at that point band together and said they would not stand for fox getting excluded and they forced the white house to back down.
I'm sure you were equally outraged when obummer was doing it to fox?
If you want to live under a regime of state-run media, then move to Russia. I'm sure you'll feel right at home.
Otherwise, your 'fake news' and 'political agenda' rhetoric is just codespeak for government censorship and suppression of the free press.
There have been 44 Presidents before Trump that had to deal with the media, and they all seemed to get through it.
yeah...you don't get how logic works. You have to show that your claim of "not happening" is actually true. You can't defend that as true by simply arguing "what I said didn't happen...so can't be proven, because it didn't happen--because I said so!"
basically: you're a f*cking idiot.
Yep, that would make me what, 120 years old now? Brilliant!
Saying someone is a nazi always makes your argument so credible you know
You lefties have just come completely unhinged, and it's just delightful to watch.
Fake news is when media intentionally publishes something that they know to be wrong. Like Hillary selling our uranium to Russia, for example. That was fake news. A different opinion, or even a political agenda, does not make for fake news.Fake news organizations are being excuded.... whaaaaaaaaaaaah.
Notice how I'm not the one whining about what's happening, you are.
The difference being, the Obama administration had concerns about inaccurate facts being published, whereas the Trump administration simply labels any facts they don't like as fake news.
waaaaaaaaah, CNN is being treated by Trump the way Fox was treated by obummer. whaaaaaaah, tyranny, whaaaaaaah free press destroyed.... whaaaaaaaah! And yes, they are fake news.
Snowflakes unite
Props for creative insult
Have a look at what happened with Sun News Network in Canada. It was viewed as essentially a Fox News analog. It didn't go well for them.Is there any limit to the BS believed by the left around here? Even the liberal site Snopes says what you posted is false:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxcanada.asp