- Oct 4, 2001
- 11,552
- 1
- 0
I have a non-system drive that is going bad and I'd like to clone it to another hard drive. I know that sector copy takes a lot longer than file copy as sector copy will copy everything including the free space, while file copy doesn't. I'm wondering is there any advantage in doing a sector copy over a file copy. I just want to be able to swap the drives and the system should pretend that nothing changed.