<<
Does this mean that the drives with lower capacities are less likely to scr3w up? >>
I honestly don't know the answer to that. Having only 1 or 2 platters may help alleviate some of the heat, but I really couldn't say. Most of the reported failures were on 45GB and larger models, though, if that offers any reassurance.
<<
Wouldn't you think that IBM has corrected this issue and all the new drives and repaired drives will not fail from this particular type of breakdown? I find it hard to imagine that IBM would still be selling a HD model that they KNOW is going to most likely fail in a year and they will have to repair... >>
The 75GXP line was replaced with the 60GXP series, and shouldn't be in production any longer. The 60GXPs don't appear to be nearly as likely to suffer from the same issue, judging by the commentary in newsgroups and in reviews.
<<
Aside from the ONE class action (which has spawned about a million identical articles), what else has been found on the entire GXP line. Are there any sources out there besides Billy Joe Jim Bob, who swears he has 50 drives running Quake3 24/7, that can attest to this? Otherwise it seems like piling on to me. >>
Honestly, greg, all I can offer you is what I watched unfolding at the time the failures were happening. I've compiled a few links to Google's newsgroup archive, you can read them for yourself and make your own conclusion.
Title indicates the keywords I used to perform the searches:
75GXP failure - 1280 posts
75GXP fail - 805 posts
75GXP RMA - 521 posts
75GXP died - 311 posts
75GXP dead - 460 posts
75GXP failing - 553 posts
Undoubtedly, a number of those posts are going to be duplicates in different searches, but suffice it to say that this is more than just a handful of rednecks having a problem with the 75GXP series.
I read several of the newsgroups that will come up in all/any of those searches, have for several years, and was reading them when the reports of failures began to DELUGE the groups. A lot of very skilled people were having some serious problems, and were VERY unhappy. A good percentage of the people who posted reports of problems were IT buyers and professionals, too, who'd purchased several 75GXPs and had more than half of them fail within weeks... or days. Not running games, just ordinary office work, in ordinary office machines, that worked with prior and subsequent drives.
And this was just what was hitting the fan in the newsgroups. I'm sure you can find the same in just about any web forum you care to search.
As for my own experience, I never bought a 75GXP. I didn't have the money at the time. I do know my science, though, and what I described above is not only possible, but VERY likely if there's even the slightest defect or error in manufacturing or design. GFMR technology is very sensitive, and the most minute alteration in a platter's physical dimensions can render an entire HDD unusable, especially when you increase the areal density. My explanation isn't so much supposition as it is conclusion based on the evidence and a working knowledge of HDD technologies. The results are reproducable on any working HDD with GFMR heads.
Er... don't try that at home, kids. You'll have to RMA it.
Given all of that, I would use a 75GXP, if the price were right, but I'd have a bay cooler on it at all times to keep it as cool as possible. Heat is the killer. But I'd darn sure have backups going on a nightly basis, just in case.