[Semiaccurate] GK104/Kepler/GTX680 Next Week?

[thilanliyan]

I pick up dates on eharmony all the time, chicks dig Fermi.

They must think you have loads of cash...enough to pay for the power bills :awe:

 

[BallaTheFeared]

Chicks dig guys with a lot of power.

 

[X98]

o lawd rofl

http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/26179-kepler-256-bit-faster-in-dx11-games-than-7970

the comments hilarious, amd fanboys getting mad that GK104 is gonna dominate

 

[zod96]

I hope nvidia finally puts display port on their cards....

 

[Makaveli]

They must think you have loads of cash...enough to pay for the power bills :awe:

haha =D

 

[BallaTheFeared]

hehe, I got something for you guys :thumbsup:

As promised...

Reference:

Ballin:

This isn't the fermi you're looking for :thumbsup:


Also Tom's is raining on the parade...

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-gpu-kepler-graphics-card-geforce,14921.html

According to reports, the 290 mm2 GK104 chip shown in the pictures will be used in GTX650Ti and GTX 660 graphics cards, which will arrive with 448 and 512 activated stream processors, respectively, as well as a core clock of about 850 and 900 MHz. The first Kepler cards are expected to be announced next month.

Also they added:

What we gather from these pictures is that Kepler cards could be huge with potentially high power consumption. About a month ago, we published the full list of Kepler cards ranging from the GTX640 to the GTX690.

Time to go back into your holes secret ninja Nvidia fans.

 

[tviceman]

o lawd rofl

the comments hilarious, amd fa... save and show other forums for a good laugh.

 

[AnandThenMan]

FFS not this again

 

[Silverforce11]

So gk104 is 512 core part, at 900mhz core with its hotclocks intact. This is actually more realistic, next-gen mid-range = previous gen high end + a bit.

 

[BallaTheFeared]

So gk104 is 512 core part, at 900mhz core with its hotclocks intact. This is actually more realistic, next-gen mid-range = previous gen high end + a bit.

lol aren't rumors fun?

I agree though it seems more reasonable, the real question is the 512 core part called the GTX680, which would be epically stupid, or are real GK100/110 coming soon (as in the coming months, not late Q3 or next year)?

But if it's based on GK104, wouldn't it have different core counts since GK104/114 are designed differently than GF100/110 and have more shader cores per cluster...

I dunno what to believe actually.

 

[chimaxi83]

hehe, I got something for you guys :thumbsup:

As promised...

Reference:

Ballin:

This isn't the fermi you're looking for :thumbsup:

I don't get it... your 470's, for the 98765139th time, but so?

 

[BallaTheFeared]

Lower temps, lower voltage, lower power draw. Why else would I post it after it was insinuated that I pay a lot for power?

 

[Grooveriding]

3D center performance estimates on the latest gk104 specs processing power potential

http://translate.google.ca/translat...enleistung&hl=en&biw=1704&bih=1214&prmd=imvns

 

[BallaTheFeared]

Is that based on, which reported spec?

The 512 at 900 core or the 1500 at 700 core?

Seems to go against what the guy from [H] reported but who really knows at this point?

 

[Soccerman06]

Not this again >.>

 

[boxleitnerb]

Based on 705 MHz core clock, hot clock and 1536CCs. So it's wrong

 

[blackened23]

o lawd rofl

http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/26179-kepler-256-bit-faster-in-dx11-games-than-7970

the comments hilarious, amd fanboys getting mad that GK104 is gonna dominate

Almost as bad as the nvidia fanboys posting blanket statements like this independant benchmarks are released?

Thanks for registering to share this comment

 

[blackened23]

Also Tom's is raining on the parade...

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-gpu-kepler-graphics-card-geforce,14921.html




Also they added:

Time to go back into your holes secret ninja Nvidia fans.

Jesus dude really

 

[X98]

i feel srry for that 7970 of urs

won't even last half a year

 

[Makaveli]

Wow the trolls are hungry in this thread!

Isn't it past your bed time junior?

 

[kidsafe]

Lower temps, lower voltage, lower power draw. Why else would I post it after it was insinuated that I pay a lot for power?

Why not plug your PSU power cord into a Kill-A-Watt and show the real VA or wattage drawn?

For example, I can make my PC do this.

A Single 2600K@4.9GHz and 7970@1225MHz

 

[blackened23]

i feel srry for that 7970 of urs

won't even last half a year

LOL wow, are you 13 or something

 

[BallaTheFeared]

Jesus dude really

:whiste:

 

[railven]

Nah, just a plate with GK104 on it.

Haha, touche! Crow goes good with a nice cup of red wine, your choice of course haha.

Railven did...right, Railven?

When he was running nVidia anyway.

When we first started dating (I've always been an ATI guy, except I was having an affair with 8800 GTS - who didn't?) it was a subject we'd talk about. She was hardcore nVidia and AMD-CPU.

Ah to be geeky on a date...haha.

 

[railven]

Lower temps, lower voltage, lower power draw. Why else would I post it after it was insinuated that I pay a lot for power?

I thought your wife paid the bills? haha.