AreaCode7O7
Senior member
- Mar 6, 2005
- 931
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: AreaCode707
Originally posted by: mugs
I agree with the senator. The H-1B program is abused to get cheaper labor, not better labor. If we have enough qualified Americans to do the job (and we have more than enough right now) we should be employing them first. Bringing foreigners here to do those jobs while Americans are out of work means the government is indirectly subsidizing those jobs with the unemployment benefits it's paying. WHY should our government pay money so foreign citizens can come here and work? :roll:
The idea that the Americans who are being laid off were unqualified (or less qualified) is bunk. They were qualified to work at Microsoft before, and to make the salary they were making before. They make more money than the H-1B workers, so they get the axe.
Do you even know who got laid off at MS? Much of it was temp labor and nearly all of it was in operational capacities that don't employ H1-B workers anyway. H1-Bs work in IT, not HR. This is just a publicity stunt for this senator. He's comparing apples and oranges.
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource...ft/archives/160076.asp
The company said that jobs would be eliminated in research and development, marketing, sales, finance, legal, human resources, and IT.
IT = help desk and other support capacity in this case. R&D is on their more fanciful set of projects, not their core products where they brought in H1-Bs for specialty skills. I've got probably two dozen MS contacts, mostly in HR, that I've been in touch with since the news came out. The layoffs aren't hitting in areas where many H1-Bs are working or affecting jobs where the H1-Bs have comparable skills to the Americans, so the senator's admirable call is meaningless.