Yes, quite a bit is disgusting here.
But let's check the Constitution, shall we?
Since sanctions are also involved let us acknowledge Art 1 Section 8:
So here again we have an example of Obama as Emperor, acting unilaterally and overstepping constitutional boundaries.
So the Constitution says he must pursue treaties with foreign countries
with the advice and consent of the Senate and they must vote to approve it; Obama doesn't like that? OK, let's just call it something other than a "treaty" (another Exec Order?) and we can completely skirt the Constitution. Holder told him so.
If Obama's 'deal', as he has so far leaked it, allows Iran to have nuke weapon capability; there's your
war right there. The other countries in the M.E. cannot allow it. Israel won't allow it. Israel unilaterally moved to terminate Egypt's program. Israel unilaterally moved to stop Syria's program.
Israel has an official policy of preventing its neighbors of attaining nuke weapon capability:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begin_Doctrine
The one who is starting a war here is Obama. It's as if he's pushing Israel to it.
This letter isn't directed at Iran. It's directed at the other parties in the M.E. Israel is not the only country deeply concerned about Iran and nukes. If Obama thinks he can negotiate a treaty without Congress, Constitution be damned, fine. Impeachment doesn't seem an option for this Congress. But they can let the other parties in the region know that we will NOT allow Iran to get nukes, thus they need not act unilaterally and cause a war trying to destroy Iran's facilities.
--------------
Here's an article from a French news agency in English. You might to read it to get an idea of where other countries stand as regards Obama's 'deal':
Entire article here:
http://www.france24.com/en/20150304-nuclear-iran-how-netanyahu-became-advocate-arab-world/
Fern