Server hardware is a ripoff

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MiniDoom

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2004
5,307
0
71
That assumption is using VMWare - they could use XenCenter or Hyper-V to provide failover, or even using Veem with free VMWare.

I'm not a hyperv guy, but doesn't DRS or PRO as MS calls it require system center? and I think you mean Veeam? I stand by my original statement, if OP wants to skimp on the server hardware what makes you think he is going to want to purchase vcenter, system center or veeam? OP would probably just need a standalone esxi server with a decent backup solution.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
This would also require the purchase of vcenter which no small office is going to do.

No small office is buying an R730xd with 768GB RAM either.

Over the stock ~$2500 configuration, that's adding $7k in CPU and $4k in RAM. By the time you go redundant PSU and add five drives (four plus hot spare) and Server 2012, we are looking at $18.5k for a single server (with 384GB RAM, not 768GB).

For a smaller business that was considering a single $18-20k server, personally I would recommend (depending on specific needs) two ~$8k servers and a lower-end VMware license (with support) over one giant powerhouse.

$0.02.

That assumption is using VMWare - they could use XenCenter or Hyper-V to provide failover, or even using Veem with free VMWare.

Or that.
 

MiniDoom

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2004
5,307
0
71
DRS is not HA. HA is failover clustering which can be done by hyper-v without system center. In fact hyper-v without system center has more features than esxi free. It's why so many small businesses have moved to hyper-v. You can get 95% of the features that vmware requires vcenter for with live migration and failover clustering being the most important.

You have to buy windows licenses anyway, so there really is no good reason to not use hyper-v (except for owning vmware licensing). The problem is going to be the skill that properly setting up and managing hyper-v requires.

I know what DRS is and never said it was HA. If you read the post jlee suggested OP use DRS and I replied you need vcenter or system center to use DRS or PRO.
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
175
106
I'm not a hyperv guy, but doesn't DRS or PRO as MS calls it require system center? and I think you mean Veeam? I stand by my original statement, if OP wants to skimp on the server hardware what makes you think he is going to want to purchase vcenter, system center or veeam? OP would probably just need a standalone esxi server with a decent backup solution.

DRS requires System Center VMM but HA does not. Hyper-V 2012 R2 Server is free and so long as you already have an AD domain and shared storage, you can cluster them for HA at no cost.

For a two server cluster, DRS is less important to have.
 

MiniDoom

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2004
5,307
0
71
DRS requires System Center VMM but HA does not. Hyper-V 2012 R2 Server is free and so long as you already have an AD domain and shared storage, you can cluster them for HA at no cost.

For a two server cluster, DRS is less important to have.

Understood and I agree. My original point was if OP is skimping on a single servers cost, what makes people think he's going to buy two servers and set HA or DRS?
 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
I've never found Supermicro to be too much cheaper than Dell/HP. I would love to see you quote some actual numbers. There's nothing stopping you from putting standard parts into a Dell/HP. I've got OEM Hynix RAM in my HP's, tossed the old HP memory in some Dell's, and put the Dell memory in some Supermicro's. I've got similarly mix and matched drives. Are there some proprietary parts? Sure, but Supermicro has proprietary parts too.



ROFL. That's not even remotely practical for smaller companies. Everyone here seems to be operating under the assumption that all companies have a complete IT staff onsite. Setting up a cluster, especially a multisite cluster isn't something there's an easy button for.

Not to mention I've worked for a company that used that system and it's got no shortage of headaches as well.



Until you realize you are paying an IT Admin $80k a year plus benefits to sit there waiting for something to break rather than paying Dell/HP/SMS/etc like $800/year.

I can call HP (or email them) and in 30 minutes I'll have a new drive on the way. SMS will have it on the way in like 5 minutes.



There's nothing stopping you from doing the same thing with an OEM. Have you ever actually done this before? I can get parts for my HP/Dell's just as easy as my Supermicro's.

If you're outside warranty and still using the box (that's a whole different conversation) there's companies like SMS (System Maintenance Services) that offer post manufacturer warranty support.



I've never seen that used as the primary factor in the purchasing process. Not to mention it doesn't matter how much you spend, something can still go wrong.

Not to mention all that assumed you keep a full IT staff onsite. We support roughly ~110 customers. All of their equipment is configured to send SNMP trap alerts to us. We get an alert, call HP/Dell/SMS, tell them they need to go replace a drive/fan/battery/whatever. Call the client and tell them somebody will be there at X time and will need access to the server closet. Our client has 0 IT staff onsite and doesn't even have to touch the server.
Nice to see other IT people who are adaptable to the company and the situation. I think most IT people go through school or get trained at one job and then since that is all they know they are never comfortable outside of that environment and try to replicate it wherever they go and refer to that as "The correct way"

I've worked at the largest bank in the world, Dotcoms back in the late 90's, telecom companies, ISP's all the way down to single servers in small schools and small offices. Each of them has completely different needs and good IT people would adapt to those needs AND the financial constraints a company has.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
Understood and I agree. My original point was if OP is skimping on a single servers cost, what makes people think he's going to buy two servers and set HA or DRS?

Oh he won't - but the guy I replied to said he'd buy a single server to the tune of almost $20k.
 

nsafreak

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2001
7,093
3
81
What started as a "point & laugh at the op" thread has turned into an informative thread. Gotta love ATOT.
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
175
106
Understood and I agree. My original point was if OP is skimping on a single servers cost, what makes people think he's going to buy two servers and set HA or DRS?

You weren't sure if DRS in Hyper-V requires VMM. I answered. That's all.

Personally, Hyper-V free would be just fine for this client even if they didn't cluster the hosts. Can still replicate important VMs between the two hosts in case one goes down then manually failover the replicated VMs.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,129
1,604
126
Of all the reasons why running server grade hardware is important, the one that I think should be stressed the most, is ECC. You absa-frickin-lutely do not want to be without ECC.

You do not want to be without at least RAID 1 or RAID 10 for vital filesystems.

You absolutely need solid off site backup.

you can use desktop grade drives, and use software raid, and yea ,that's probably fine. You can use online file backup OK. but, its a very unnecessary risk for any business to be running without ECC memory.
 

Cruisin1

Golden Member
Oct 10, 1999
1,119
0
71
Oh I agree. Believe me when I say I don't care for this shit. I build one gaming rig every few years and don't give a damn in between those times. I have an IT friend and he talks to me like I care. It puts me in a coma.



RAID IS NOT BACK UP. There, I said it. But I swear I thought that's what raid 1 was for.

RAID is for redundancy or more generally a small piece of high availabily for business continuity.

Backup has nothing to do with RAID. Backup is something you should go to at a last resort. Sounds to me that your business doens't care about business continuity... which may be okay with you guys. I'm assuming you're a local sandwich shop
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,129
1,604
126
RAID is for redundancy or more generally a small piece of high availabily for business continuity.

Backup has nothing to do with RAID. Backup is something you should go to at a last resort. Sounds to me that your business doens't care about business continuity... which may be okay with you guys. I'm assuming you're a local sandwich shop

Yes, Backup is the answer to questions like: "how do I retrieve my data after the office building burns down and all the on site equipment is a total loss."

or "lady stepped on gas instead of brakes and smashed into the office, she wound up destroying the server cabinet and smashing everything to bits" ..

Backup is used for when some dumb exec gives their system password to a phisher on the phone, and then your system gets hacked and they hold your data hostage.

Backup is used for when you dont have ECC and your raid array gets fucked because you bought shitty memory.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
67,932
12,383
126
www.anyf.ca
RAID is for redundancy or more generally a small piece of high availabily for business continuity.

Backup has nothing to do with RAID. Backup is something you should go to at a last resort. Sounds to me that your business doens't care about business continuity... which may be okay with you guys. I'm assuming you're a local sandwich shop

Yeah you want BOTH. Not one or the other. Backups are a last resort if there is a total catastrophic failure, but are also for versioning, because users are stupid and delete files, then call IT to get it back a month later.

Without raid, you risk lot of downtime and hassle when the hard drive fails. You need to restore backups, and also redo all the permissions. God help you if it's a file server with user home directories and stuff. The extra cost of having raid will be lost in time having to rebuild everything.

Which brings us back to enterprise vs DIY. You are better off having a DIY raid solution, than no raid at all. And when I say raid I'm talking about redundant raid, not raid 0. ZFS and other similar solutions are ok too. The key is, you want a system that when a drive fails, you're not dead in the water.
 

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
You guys still yaking about this? Jesus Christ you guys are something else. Put me in a damn coma with this boring crap. Thanks for the advice though. Much appreciated. :biggrin:
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
38,003
18,350
146
Dont worry moon, guys like us will clean up the mess when your shit hits the fan. It will cost ya tho.
 

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,513
221
106
You guys still yaking about this? Jesus Christ you guys are something else. Put me in a damn coma with this boring crap. Thanks for the advice though. Much appreciated. :biggrin:

Apparently our shit's not broken, so we can talk about it.
 

Puppies04

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2011
5,909
17
76
So I'm buying a server for my job and I was going to get a real server, with real server hardware, with a real server OS, and real server ram, and a real server pair of SSD, and then I saw the price and it gave me a real severe headache.
I'm buying a god damn gaming PC and using that. Screw this expensive crap.

So i'm buying a parachute and I was going to get a real one, with real parachute fabric, with real parachute cord , and reall parachute pull strings, and a real parachute backpack and a real pair of shoulder straps, and then I saw the price and it really brought me down to earth.

I'm buying a god damn bedsheet and using that, screw this expensive crap.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |