Sessions confirmed as AG

[kage69]

Regarding Sessions and Coretta Scott King

Bush created a marine sanctuary - does that mean he didn't gut the EPA and push corporation friendly regulation through? Just saying.

Anyway, not that I just don't love libraries as much as the next guy but what Sessions has exercised in regards to the voting booth seems to be the issue.

I really just don't get the incredulous response to the aversion of Sessions (not you, saying in general among Trump voters). It's entirely appropriate considering the GOPs hangup on the myth of voter fraud and Trump's penchant for fascist beliefs and conspiracy theories.

Do they need someone to draw them a picture?

 

[raildogg]

LOL at all these guys Trump is picking.

The reality TV star is playing his part well.

We are watching a reality show, only this time it might have real world affects for some people.

"Battle of the Billionaires"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NsrwH9I9vE

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Bush created a marine sanctuary - does that mean he didn't gut the EPA and push corporation friendly regulation through? Just saying.

Anyway, not that I just don't love libraries as much as the next guy but what Sessions has exercised in regards to the voting booth seems to be the issue.

I really just don't get the incredulous response to the aversion of Sessions (not you, saying in general among Trump voters). It's entirely appropriate considering the GOPs hangup on the myth of voter fraud and Trump's penchant for fascist beliefs and conspiracy theories.

Do they need someone to draw them a picture?

I notice that you edited out the whole of his post. It's really amusing to me that you lack the integrity to have put his whole quote in your response. Thanks.

 

[pcgeek11]

Your sexism is showing.

Nothing sexist about it. The rule applies to every one of the Senators.

How is that sexist?

Your ignorance is showing.

 

[ivwshane]

Nothing sexist about it. The rule applies to every one of the Senators.

How is that sexist?

Your ignorance is showing.

No your ignorance is showing, fluffer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...rule-19-suggests-it-is-very-loosely-enforced/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...izabeth-warren-break-rules-plus-5-other-ques/

Compared to the examples, what she was doing was extremely mild. Not only that but this was for a confirmation hearing where criticism is expected.

 

[pcgeek11]

No your ignorance is showing, fluffer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...rule-19-suggests-it-is-very-loosely-enforced/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...izabeth-warren-break-rules-plus-5-other-ques/

Compared to the examples, what she was doing was extremely mild. Not only that but this was for a confirmation hearing where criticism is expected.

No, actually your ignorance is showing.

I realize that it is rarely used as most that ride the edge are warned and actually stop the infringement.

"Sen. Warren was giving a lengthy speech," McConnell told his fellow lawmakers. "She had appeared to violate the rule. She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted."

It is a rule. She continued to violate the rule after a warning and was made to sit.

 

[Jhhnn]

No, actually your ignorance is showing.

I realize that it is rarely used as most that ride the edge are warned and actually stop the infringement.

"Sen. Warren was giving a lengthy speech," McConnell told his fellow lawmakers. "She had appeared to violate the rule. She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted."

It is a rule. She continued to violate the rule after a warning and was made to sit.

Bullshit.

Adding fuel to the backlash, supporters noted the apparent hypocrisy that Warren's male colleagues were able to read from the letter uninterrupted. Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico read the letter to enter it into the congressional record Wednesday morning and Sen. Jeff Merkley was allowed to read from King's letter Tuesday night, though he couched his remarks as only reading portions of the letter and with the context to be in line with Senate rules.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/07/politics/elizabeth-warren-silenced/

Repubs slapped down Warren but not Udall for doing the same thing.

 

[mrjminer]

Bullshit.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/07/politics/elizabeth-warren-silenced/
Repubs slapped down Warren but not Udall for doing the same thing.

Every day, I am amazed.

...though he couched his remarks as only reading portions of the letter and with the context to be in line with Senate rules.

 

[pcgeek11]

Bullshit.



http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/07/politics/elizabeth-warren-silenced/

Repubs slapped down Warren but not Udall for doing the same thing.

Bullshit. The rule specifically states:

"no Senator in debate shall, directly or indirectly, by any form of words impute to another Senator or to other Senators any conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a Senator."

I don't think they were in debate the next day.