mfenn
Elite Member
Personal preference I guess. If it was mine, at home, i'd want to be able to run more then just ZFS. Performance wouldn't take that big of a hit.
Web portals are nice, but command line is where it's at!
I think that you're under the impression that the OP is running FreeNAS. He's not, he's running Ubuntu Server and ZoL. Linux is a perfectly capable hypervisor with KVM.
That's not really true - if the hardware is enterprisey enough, it'll support PCI passthrough - just drop in a SATA card, pass it through the the VM, and it'll address the drives directly as though it was a hardware box, then create iSCSI LUNs on the ZFS server and pass them back to ESX as datastores.
Now, that said, it's not recommended since you can end up with chicken/egg problems if you put the SAN server datastore on a LUN it manages.
Yes, you could do some "cool virtualization tricks" to make it work. But just because you can doesn't meant that it's a good idea. Which is why I didn't mention it at all. In other words, "cool virtualization tricks" are a really bad idea for a system that is primarily supposed to serve storage with no fuss.