ok.. i want to know what does what...
server 2003 / winXP environment
for example share permissions are read, write, and full.. this doesn't give me much flexibility.. local permissions give 8 or so options. edit, read, write, modify, delete, etc...
so how do they work? i have a directory.. and i want someone to have read access to that directory, then inside that directory i want them to have more access to the subdirectory.. the only way i can see doign this is to give them "write" permission to the main shared directory.. then set a local permission disallowing them to be able to do anything but read.. then i have to set the subdirectory to not inherit permissions from the parent directory.. then i can set the permissions in there how i want.. but i don't really even know how well it works. i guess i need to just test it as a restricted user.. but that requires me to log off... this just gets too complicated though.. is there a way to get a more comprehensive set of share permissions so i dont' have to worry about local permissions at all?
thanks
scott
server 2003 / winXP environment
for example share permissions are read, write, and full.. this doesn't give me much flexibility.. local permissions give 8 or so options. edit, read, write, modify, delete, etc...
so how do they work? i have a directory.. and i want someone to have read access to that directory, then inside that directory i want them to have more access to the subdirectory.. the only way i can see doign this is to give them "write" permission to the main shared directory.. then set a local permission disallowing them to be able to do anything but read.. then i have to set the subdirectory to not inherit permissions from the parent directory.. then i can set the permissions in there how i want.. but i don't really even know how well it works. i guess i need to just test it as a restricted user.. but that requires me to log off... this just gets too complicated though.. is there a way to get a more comprehensive set of share permissions so i dont' have to worry about local permissions at all?
thanks
scott