Yeah that didn't answer my question. Would nutrient sufficient shake be ok too?
To your other comment. Just because someone wipes their ass (as I would have done) with a flag doesn't make them less than human. Nor does it account for those there either falsely imprisoned or incarcerated for non-violent "crimes".
You made a statement about innocents who are convicted. You made this statement again now. I was addressing that statement.
As to your other question, as long as the shake provided sufficient nutritional content and would not cause any health issues, then sure. I used to make these for myself back in college when I didn't have much time. Basically take my dinner, throw it in a blender, drink it down. Regardless, this is a slippery slope fallacy, so what is the point of this? He isn't giving them a shake, so how is that question even relevant.
Look, its very simple. Behave, and you get to eat a normal meal. Misbehave, and you get something that is healthful, but really doesn't taste. If giving prisoners bland tasting food is now considered inhumane treatment, then the state is probably going to come take my kids away. I gave them the choice of eating their dinner or going hungry last night. And they didn't get a cookie because they were fighting. Where did you take the leap that these people are less than human?
And again, I don't see how it is relevant whether someone was falsely imprisoned. Even if you are falsely imprisoned, it is in your best interest to behave. Taking a flag and wiping your ass with it is not considered behaving. What are you? An immature adolescent that scratches "fuck me please" into bathroom stalls? No, it doesn't make them less than human. Yes, it is a behavior problem. This isn't that complicated.