As MomenNT fails to realize, only irrational people kill people and having un constricted access to guns is the best way to make it possible for people to kill people,
Mr Allman is the NRA version of Mr. Everyman, have gun will travel, and use it on fellow citizens. Sounds more like only guns kill people to me.
Is that the NRA answer that everyone should carry guns so every road rage incident will be settled by guns?
I thank God I live in a region of the country where I need not carry a gun and people need not carry guns to protect themselves against NRA powered criminals.
So in addition to batshit crazy you're also completely ignorant of the NRA. Speaking as a member who regularly reads NRA statements and literature, I have never read or heard anything about unrestricted access to guns. In fact the NRA has condemned such shootings and is currently condemning the ATF for allowing unrestricted access to guns (irony much?).
And yes, the NRAs philosophical argument would be that if the majority of the populace were armed, attacks like this would be less frequent and far less extended. If this shooting had happened in Kennesaw GA, where every household able to own a gun is required to do so, this idiot probably would have been shot in the opening minute.
And no, there are no gunfights in the streets of Kennesaw. In fact in the 30 years they've had this mandate, burglaries have dropped 80+%, and murders are all but unheard of.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/3/27/223955.shtml
But go ahead, keep towing the party line of the Brady Campaign and Bill Mahr. I love how the left keeps predicting wild-west gunfights with
any loosening of gun rights, and yet when said loosening fails to produce these fights, or any rise in crime at all, they continue their blind bleating. It gets even better when they blame shootings in strict gun-control states on gun rights lobbyists who by any definition have little power there. I don't understand how anyone who purports him/herself to be rational and logical can completely skip over the gaps in their own thinking like a broken record player.
But then again, we are talking about the party that gives Obama a pass on Guantanamo and blames Palin's bullshit rhetoric when a Senator gets shot. Funny thing is, it's also the left that was saying violent video games don't adversely affect kids. So according to lefties: violent video games, where you run around
personally executing people, don't have a negative affect on
kids; but mildly militant
words have a huge negative affect on
adults?
I could go on with the contradictions, and the right isn't any better, but at least the right has the balls to come out and say "yeah, we contradicted ourselves. Deal with it." whereas the left takes this aloof "holier than thou" attitude and rationalizes itself to death.
Less anyone stupidly accuse me of being a partisan, as things currently stand I'll probably be voting for Obama.