Where the right deflects attention to the left when one of their screws up.
Have you checked in on Hilary? Trump can't get that girl off his mind!
Where the right deflects attention to the left when one of their screws up.The left calls for unity when one of theirs screws up.
Do you have an example of this?Where the right deflects attention to the left when one of their screws up.
Have you checked in on Hilary? Trump can't get that girl off his mind!
Do you have an actual refutation of this or did you think trolling bluster was enough?lol, in what fucking world and what quality of crack does it take for you to get so fucked over in the order of things like this?
I am a firm believer that self preservation is the best motivation. If Republicans still think that having lots of pissed off people with easy access to guns is a great idea, then I doubt us liberals pontificating on gun control will change their minds.
Do you have an example of this?
Explain how this is an example of what Jackstar said.Why is that Hillary Clintons family and Dems dealings with Russia are not looked at, but my non-dealings are?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 15, 2017
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...intons-link-with-russia-in-series-tweets.html
Looks like I misunderstood you.Twitter: @realDonaldTrump
While I am not a Republican taking your comment related to easy access to guns to it's logical conclusion you are (perhaps?) referring to a change in gun laws that resulted in citizens not having easy access to guns, that being legal private ownership.
I'm a firm proponent of the 2nd amendment but at the same time getting really sick of firearms, which are really tools albeit deadly as that's a main purpose, being misused by the sick to perpetrate public shootings.
But I have yet to read a single solution that if enacted before hand would have 100% prevented the shooting and allow lawful citizens to continue enjoying their 2nd amendment rights that inevitably results in gun control discussions and proposals which is depressing.
Lawful owners will always be able to say that it's not their fault, so why should they give up a revered constitutional right? And they're right.
So I think we're stuck with the status quo and it will take societal changes and not a massive change in gun control to affect the status quo in regards to these shootings.
I find it very disagreeable. I refuse to adopt the language of violence, one of the things that Repub propagandists have used to crazify their base for decades.
I think the fact that either one of the candidates raked in that many votes proves my point.Keep in mind that Hillary won the popular vote so maybe what you "fixed" doesn't really work as well as you might think.
I can't stand Trump in the least but some of the lefties in here have proven that they aren't nearly as averse to violence as they've claimed. Apparently it merely depends on who the violence is against.
For this case it seams democrats lying about republicans could have had more of a positive effect. Why wouldn't somebody a little off want to kill people who want children to die and who want the planet to end?OK. But Republicans are now busy passing laws to make it easier to carry guns across state lines and buy silencers for them. One would think that after getting shot by an out of state guy, they might not want to make it easier for others to do it silently. But we'll see.
Why wouldn't somebody a little off want to kill people who want children to die and who want the planet to end?
Explain how this is an example of what Jackstar said.
nvm, I wasn't talking about the second comment but the first.
Do you have an actual refutation of this or did you think trolling bluster was enough?
While I am not a Republican taking your comment related to easy access to guns to it's logical conclusion you are (perhaps?) referring to a change in gun laws that resulted in citizens not having easy access to guns, that being legal private ownership.
I'm a firm proponent of the 2nd amendment but at the same time getting really sick of firearms, which are really tools albeit deadly as that's a main purpose, being misused by the sick to perpetrate public shootings.
But I have yet to read a single solution that if enacted before hand would have 100% prevented the shooting and allow lawful citizens to continue enjoying their 2nd amendment rights that inevitably results in gun control discussions and proposals which is depressing.
Lawful owners will always be able to say that it's not their fault, so why should they give up a revered constitutional right? And they're right.
So I think we're stuck with the status quo and it will take societal changes and not a massive change in gun control to affect the status quo in regards to these shootings.
11 to 2? Damned Russians.
Seriously? Never been to that site.Infowars sports headlines:
Democrats shoot GOP baseball team so they can win.
False flag operation carried out in DC
Seriously? Never been to that site.
Sounds like a rumor I might spread.I was joking but it is the kind of shit they do 'report'.
How about the Warsaw uprising or the French resistance during WWII? What about the violent labor movement that helped give rise to the American middle class and period of greatest wealth equality? Is political violence NEVER justified?
Sounds like a rumor I might spread.
Is that the Alex Jones guy? That is one effed up individual. The Sandy hook story alone is enough to keep me from ever listening to him.