Shots fired at GOP Congressional baseball practice

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

John Connor

Lifer
Nov 30, 2012
22,840
617
121
Well, you'll should absolutely LOVE Oscar. You see, his minimalist life style and turning trash into a home speaks volumes about his "Eco-friendly" lifestyle. This should appeal to you all lefests. So in fact, the jokes on you.
 

Azuma Hazuki

Golden Member
Jun 18, 2012
1,532
866
131
Except Oscar doesn't do shit like that. All he does is sit in his trash can and bitch. So the joke still is, always was, and forever more will be on you. Don't make me slam the lid, Oscar.
 
Reactions: Sheik Yerbouti

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,100
38,662
136
Sorry about hitting that nerve highland, but I'll skip drawing you a map on how Trump's business fortunes have been boosted since Hillary lost. I do appreciate you deciding to pull the ultimate cop out of 'why didn't you vote then' though. It's foot-in-mouth maneuvers like that that save all of us a lot of time. Doesn't seem like you've gotten any smarter since the last time I bothered with you, but at least you seem to be in good spirits. Not letting the slow motion trainwreck in the White House get you down. Stiff upper lip! Atta boy.



Anyway, thought I'd come back and just drop this here for some added perspective:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html?_r=1

University of North Carolina Professor Charles Kurzman and Duke Professor David Schanzer found that Islam-inspired terror attacks accounted for 50 deaths since 9/11, but that “right-wing extremists averaged 337 attacks per year in the decade after 9/11, causing a total of 254 fatalities.”

"Since 2000, the handout notes, 25 law enforcement officers have been killed by right-wing extremists, who share a “fear that government will confiscate firearms” and a “belief in the approaching collapse of government and the economy.”


And none of it produced what this shooting did among the right....go figure.

*note that the article is 2 years old though*
 
Last edited:

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,100
38,662
136
Why can't you ask questions that are based on truthful premises? Is it so you can live in a land of delusion where you're justified?

I can't speak for shithouse there, but I've noticed in a few of my acquaintances who are elderly this notion that the left-wing violence of the 60s and 70s continued unabated to this day, rather than yielding to right-wing extremist violence in the early 90s. This perception is only encouraged and enhanced by right wing media, of which all them them partake in heavily on a near daily basis.
 

buckshot24

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2009
9,916
85
91
True. OTOH, he wasn't influenced by exhortations to violence by Sanders or Clinton. There is no equivalence between anything they said & Trump's words.
Just the nonsense that the GOP want children to starve, that they want people to die of cancer, and that they are all traitors and Russian stooges. The left demonizes the GOP constantly and unashamedly and you're going to get nuts like this taking action.
 

Younigue

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2017
5,888
1,446
106
Just the nonsense that the GOP want children to starve, that they want people to die of cancer, and that they are all traitors and Russian stooges. The left demonizes the GOP constantly and unashamedly and you're going to get nuts like this taking action.
All evidence points to them making it extremely difficult for starving children to thrive or for cancer patients to survive. Their policies are cruel, maybe they are demons.

The longer they support Trump, the more they look like traitors.

The Russian stuff... we'll see.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Just the nonsense that the GOP want children to starve, that they want people to die of cancer, and that they are all traitors and Russian stooges. The left demonizes the GOP constantly and unashamedly and you're going to get nuts like this taking action.

That exaggeration is not the same as Trump's open exhortations to violence.
 

Paladin3

Diamond Member
Mar 5, 2004
4,933
877
126
Sorry about hitting that nerve highland, but I'll skip drawing you a map on how Trump's business fortunes have been boosted since Hillary lost. I do appreciate you deciding to pull the ultimate cop out of 'why didn't you vote then' though. It's foot-in-mouth maneuvers like that that save all of us a lot of time. Doesn't seem like you've gotten any smarter since the last time I bothered with you, but at least you seem to be in good spirits. Not letting the slow motion trainwreck in the White House get you down. Stiff upper lip! Atta boy.


Anyway, thought I'd come back and just drop this here for some added perspective:

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html?_r=1

University of North Carolina Professor Charles Kurzman and Duke Professor David Schanzer found that Islam-inspired terror attacks accounted for 50 deaths since 9/11, but that “right-wing extremists averaged 337 attacks per year in the decade after 9/11, causing a total of 254 fatalities.”

"Since 2000, the handout notes, 25 law enforcement officers have been killed by right-wing extremists, who share a “fear that government will confiscate firearms” and a “belief in the approaching collapse of government and the economy.”


And none of it produced what this shooting did among the right....go figure.

*note that the article is 2 years old though*
Yet folks on both ends of the political spectrum can't come together and decry all violence regardless of the target. Instead they spend all their time trying to prove the other side is more violent (wrong, stupid, misguided, racist, sexist, homophobic, fiscally irresponsible, morally corrupt, etc.) than the other side to win points. Like the actions of a few wack-jobs on either side represent everyone of that political belief.

You guys are so intent on the battle you don't even know what you are fighting for.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,346
15,161
136
Yet folks on both ends of the political spectrum can't come together and decry all violence regardless of the target. Instead they spend all their time trying to prove the other side is more violent (wrong, stupid, misguided, racist, sexist, homophobic, fiscally irresponsible, morally corrupt, etc.) than the other side to win points. Like the actions of a few wack-jobs on either side represent everyone of that political belief.

You guys are so intent on the battle you don't even know what you are fighting for.

Sanity? Reality?

But who am I kidding? Both sides! Right? /s
 

Paladin3

Diamond Member
Mar 5, 2004
4,933
877
126
Knowing people are actively working on a plan to take away the healthcare your family depends on is pretty powerful motivation.
But still not enough to justify shooting someone, right? Right??? You're not exaggerating to make a point and almost justify the shooting, are you? Are you???
 
Last edited:

Azuma Hazuki

Golden Member
Jun 18, 2012
1,532
866
131
White people like to quote Dr. King Jr. a lot, apparently because they think he's useful to bludgeon "uppity" people upside the head with.

There's a quote of his they don't seem to like as much, though, and that is "riot is the language of the unheard."

What does this mean? It means even though the violence is wrong, it's understandable and perhaps inevitable when people have been pushed too far. If someone does shoot up a bunch of Senators over health care, while I won't condone it, I'll certainly understand it.
 

xthetenth

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2014
1,800
529
106
White people like to quote Dr. King Jr. a lot, apparently because they think he's useful to bludgeon "uppity" people upside the head with.

There's a quote of his they don't seem to like as much, though, and that is "riot is the language of the unheard."

What does this mean? It means even though the violence is wrong, it's understandable and perhaps inevitable when people have been pushed too far. If someone does shoot up a bunch of Senators over health care, while I won't condone it, I'll certainly understand it.

It's depressing and hilarious to look at things like political cartoons that invoke MLK as a point of comparison to 'these horrid thugs these days and their rioting' and then go back to before he was assassinated and look at the cartoons where there is literally no difference between how he is depicted and how the people his legacy is invoked to discredit are portrayed these days.

It's super weird how MLK became popular once he got killed and white people got to recast him as justifiably aggrieved and they got to recast themselves as people who would most certainly have supported him because he's just so reasonable, you know?

Wait, no, that's not weird at all.

Yet folks on both ends of the political spectrum can't come together and decry all violence regardless of the target. Instead they spend all their time trying to prove the other side is more violent (wrong, stupid, misguided, racist, sexist, homophobic, fiscally irresponsible, morally corrupt, etc.) than the other side to win points. Like the actions of a few wack-jobs on either side represent everyone of that political belief.

You guys are so intent on the battle you don't even know what you are fighting for.

That's because we actually paid attention. We know for a goddamn fact that the right literally will not stop threatening and engaging in violence at an utterly disproportionate rate. They have no right whatsoever to go crying about both sides. Unless we drag some actual genuine repentance out of them, they'll just go right on back to ignoring what their guys do or justifying it to themselves. People who need to tell themselves they're oh so above it like the ending of a particularly imbecilic South Park episode are just enabling them to justify themselves.

Think about that when you're trying to tell yourself that your disengagement from reality and your willful ignorance is actually the virtue of being unbiased. All you're doing by claiming that both sides are the same is just giving the worse side a free pass. It's a good thing that your trendy disengagement gives you the basis to know that isn't justifying something truly awful, isn't it?
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |