Should Michael Sam Sue the NFL?

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

RPD

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
5,062
570
126
He's still get signed by someone, too. Just a matter of when.

A little off topic, but I was wondering if he purposely did those acts just to flee the ship after so many others did. A way to get out of his contract.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
Sweet Jesus, is Childs fucking Michael Sam or something?

hahaha Out of curiosity, would that matter? And why the hell are you guys so against me on this...are you religious fundamentalists or something?

He wasn't good enough to make the NFL, it's already been stated on the first page. NFL owners want to WIN and will attempt to sign anyone they feel will do that. If your on field performance helps your team win games off field issues will be tolerated; to a point.

Just ask Aldon Smith.

Aldon Smith is exceptional. Since you read the first page, you might have read that I thought he probably wasnt good enough to be gay and play in the NFL. The first one to do that will have to be exceptional, not just good enough. Too many guys are just good enough, so why deal with the hassles involved with a person in his situation. Losing the locker room is just about the worst thing a team can do.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
But you need to be consistent to play the game you're trying to play. In this case, we probably can accurately judge that undrafted 34 old green berets who try to make the NFL arent going to make it. So yes, I feel confident in saying that any 30 something green beret walking off the street isnt NFL caliber. Prove me wrong, or more importantly, come up with a relevant scenario.


Nope. ONE SINGLE PERSON = a WHOLE entity. No exception per you. Don't be such a pathetic hypocrite with all the new parameters/rules/situations/cases now.

Sweet Jesus, is Childs fucking Michael Sam or something?

He wasn't good enough to make the NFL, it's already been stated on the first page. NFL owners want to WIN and will attempt to sign anyone they feel will do that. If your on field performance helps your team win games off field issues will be tolerated; to a point.

Just ask Aldon Smith.

He sure is a Pac12 fanboi. As I said to another poster, I wish you the best of luck in trying to talk some football sense and logic to that fool. His mind is made up, a SOLE player WILL indicate of a WHOLE conference. LOL.

I haven't read all of the posts in this thread but I am sure the majority is not on his side yet he is still so adamant about 1 player = whole conference.
 
Last edited:

RPD

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
5,062
570
126
hahaha Out of curiosity, would that matter? And why the hell are you guys so against me on this...are you religious fundamentalists or something?



Aldon Smith is exceptional. Since you read the first page, you might have read that I thought he probably wasnt good enough to be gay and play in the NFL. The first one to do that will have to be exceptional, not just good enough. Too many guys are just good enough, so why deal with the hassles involved with a person in his situation. Losing the locker room is just about the worst thing a team can do.
It's your relationship, just given how much you are defending or trying to put together a case that somehow him being gay is the sole reason he isn't in the NFL so badly, figured you might have a vested interest.

He wasn't even just good enough to cut it on practice squad or CFL FFS, seriously the horse is long past dead.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
It's your relationship, just given how much you are defending or trying to put together a case that somehow him being gay is the sole reason he isn't in the NFL so badly, figured you might have a vested interest.

It all stems from the question that how can an SEC DPOY not make an NFL team. Nothing in this thread, nor the history of DPOYs in all major conferences, lead me to believe its not simply on the field play. And just about everyone in this thread's refusal to even consider the possibility that him making it wasn't completely football related, is all the more reason to continue to bring it up. The only reason we are even discussing him is because he is gay.

There is the feeling that the same kind of ignorance to certain realities 50 years ago would have kept me from getting a certain job, or living in a certain place, or drinking from a common water fountain. For many people, its not hard to see themselves in similar shoes. Apparently not here, but other places. lol

He wasn't even just good enough to cut it on practice squad or CFL FFS, seriously the horse is long past dead.

SEC DPOY couldnt make the CFL...that seems right to you? I dunno man, I would think a reasonable person would stop and think wtf, not simply he must not be good enough.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
Nope. ONE SINGLE PERSON = a WHOLE entity. No exception per you. Don't be such a pathetic hypocrite with all the new parameters/rules/situations/cases now.

So in your mind what should I be arguing? Green Berets cant play in the NFL? If so, fine, they cant. Come back when one does.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
Honestly, I think its more likely the teams or players are biased against him. It wasnt too long ago black players could be in pro sports. Then they couldnt play certain positions. It had nothing to do with ability. To me occam's is simply whats different about this DPOY than ones from other major conferences going back 10-15 years. He's gay. Not just gay, but openly, shouting from the roof tops gay. I can't say specifically how that effected things, but to me its reasonable that it played a part.



I know I mentioned it before, but James Harrison was smaller and slower. A combine time doesnt really reflect actual football speed. Were there any reports during his time with the NFL that suggested that speed effected his performance? I dont know, simply asking.



Which begs the question why he was SEC DPOY. Take out the gay thing, and if he doesnt make it I would look for other factors that prevented him making it, like attitude, injury, off the field issues, and then question the legitimacy of the award and the conference.
If these multiple teams were biased why even give him a shot? It makes little sense to bring him into camp or draft him if they are biased. Just ignore him and move on instead.
 

RPD

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
5,062
570
126
It all stems from the question that how can an SEC DPOY not make an NFL team. Nothing in this thread, nor the history of DPOYs in all major conferences, lead me to believe its not simply on the field play. And just about everyone in this thread's refusal to even consider the possibility that him making it wasn't completely football related, is all the more reason to continue to bring it up. The only reason we are even discussing him is because he is gay.

There is the feeling that the same kind of ignorance to certain realities 50 years ago would have kept me from getting a certain job, or living in a certain place, or drinking from a common water fountain. For many people, its not hard to see themselves in similar shoes. Apparently not here, but other places. lol



SEC DPOY couldnt make the CFL...that seems right to you? I dunno man, I would think a reasonable person would stop and think wtf, not simply he must not be good enough.
Seriously, the horse is long past dead, leave it alone. As stated again, being successful in college does not translate to pros.

Is being gay play a factor into making the roster? 100% absolutely. Just like any other item about a player can play a factor. But as the NFL has shown, you can be a COLOSSAL fuck up and STILL start, IF you are good enough. Talking about people that have literal blood on their hands, and still play.

Yet Sam, who is gay doesn't even have enough talent to be on the practice squad. It's balancing scale, his sexual orientation may work against him, but at most only a few points and yet his abilities can't overcome that small deficit.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
So in your mind what should I be arguing? Green Berets cant play in the NFL? If so, fine, they cant. Come back when one does.

What part of ONE SOLE/SINGLE PERSON = 1 WHOLE ENTITY that you do not understand? You trashed the WHOLE SEC conference SOLELY because of Sam (because he won an award in college) and now you are playing dumb?

Can't you see why other posters are trying hard to show you the light? Good grief.
 
Last edited:

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
If these multiple teams were biased why even give him a shot? It makes little sense to bring him into camp or draft him if they are biased. Just ignore him and move on instead.

Someone had to. By going public like he did, not getting drafted or getting any tryouts would have been blatantly obvious. Thats a different issue than bringing him in and letting him go...to use a conspiracy phrase, its plausible deniability. Or like a gay version of the Rooney Rule. It might not even be the organization, but the locker room. I think the NFL would like nothing more than for this to not be an issue, but if the players wont buy in it wont work. And they cant really cushion it by saying we wanted Sam to make it, but our bigoted, wife beating, weed smoking players froze him out.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
What part of ONE SOLE/SINGLE PERSON = 1 WHOLE ENTITY that you do not understand? Now you are changing your stance?

Can't you see why other posters are trying hard to show you the light? Good grief.

I haven't understood most of what you have posted in the last day or two.. Its like you can't come up with an intelligent contribution so you post nonsense hoping no one will notice.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
Seriously, the horse is long past dead, leave it alone. As stated again, being successful in college does not translate to pros.

Is being gay play a factor into making the roster? 100% absolutely. Just like any other item about a player can play a factor. But as the NFL has shown, you can be a COLOSSAL fuck up and STILL start, IF you are good enough. Talking about people that have literal blood on their hands, and still play.

Yet Sam, who is gay doesn't even have enough talent to be on the practice squad. It's balancing scale, his sexual orientation may work against him, but at most only a few points and yet his abilities can't overcome that small deficit.

And thats something that I have stated previously. He isnt good enough to be gay and play in the NFL. That person would have to be exceptional, or extremely mentally strong. But prior to your post, no one would even acknowledge the possibility that his sexuality could be any sort of factor.
 

RPD

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
5,062
570
126
And thats something that I have stated previously. He isnt good enough to be gay and play in the NFL. That person would have to be exceptional, or extremely mentally strong. But prior to your post, no one would even acknowledge the possibility that his sexuality could be any sort of factor.

I am not going to re-hash through the thread, but I think the point is you are assigning that factor (being gay) entirely too much weight. I bet even if he wasn't gay, he wouldn't be playing, he's simply been given too many opportunities.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
I haven't understood most of what you have posted in the last day or two.. Its like you can't come up with an intelligent contribution so you post nonsense hoping no one will notice.

Don't play dumb. By your own words in this thread, you => one player with an award in college = indication of a whole conference. Why can't I use the same logic of yours?

Are you trying to say that you did not say it?
 
Last edited:

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
I am not going to re-hash through the thread, but I think the point is you are assigning that factor (being gay) entirely too much weight. I bet even if he wasn't gay, he wouldn't be playing, he's simply been given too many opportunities.

The amount of weight I assign to it is to fill in the gap between an SEC DPOY simply making a roster and one that doesnt. Mind you, this is in place of no other reasonable explanation. And that is based on the fact that every SEC DPOY, and really every BCS conference DPOY for the last 10+ years has made an NFL roster in some form. And if the problem is the players in the locker room and not an organizational one, what difference would it matter how many teams gave him a shot?

One thing I've wondered about is his team and the university knew about his sexuality the year before. Maybe officials in the SEC knew it as well, and this was an effort to make some kind of statement.

Even if you remove sexuality from this equation and we were talking about a straight SEC DPOY, I would find it just as puzzling. I would look for an explanation for something other than he simply wasnt good enough. They are pretty much always good enough to make a roster on some team, for at least one year. Its always something. Attitude, injury, super shady past, and that would have to be combined with average ability. And then to say he couldnt even make the CFL?
 

Imported

Lifer
Sep 2, 2000
14,679
23
81
The amount of weight I assign to it is to fill in the gap between an SEC DPOY simply making a roster and one that doesnt. Mind you, this is in place of no other reasonable explanation. And that is based on the fact that every SEC DPOY, and really every BCS conference DPOY for the last 10+ years has made an NFL roster in some form. And if the problem is the players in the locker room and not an organizational one, what difference would it matter how many teams gave him a shot?

One thing I've wondered about is his team and the university knew about his sexuality the year before. Maybe officials in the SEC knew it as well, and this was an effort to make some kind of statement.

Even if you remove sexuality from this equation and we were talking about a straight SEC DPOY, I would find it just as puzzling. I would look for an explanation for something other than he simply wasnt good enough. They are pretty much always good enough to make a roster on some team, for at least one year. Its always something. Attitude, injury, super shady past, and that would have to be combined with average ability. And then to say he couldnt even make the CFL?

You could say by and large he became DPOY based on leading the SEC in sacks. However, if you were to check the game logs/stats for 2013, he recorded 9 of this 11.5 in three games against rather inferior opponents (Arkansas St., Vanderbilt and Florida). He had 2.5 sacks in the other 11 games. It'd be interesting to see his PFF grades compared to Kony Ealy for 2013 if they existed. Many thought he wasn't even the second best DE on the team.
 
Last edited:

Imported

Lifer
Sep 2, 2000
14,679
23
81
Oh hey. Someone reviewed his 2013 season: http://mmqb.si.com/2014/02/13/michael-sam-film-study-nfl-draft

My conclusion. Sam was a good player for one season in college. He was productive, so the accolades he received were earned. But being a good college player and becoming a good NFL player are two different things (see Tim Tebow). Sam did well for Missouri with a lot of talent around him. A majority of his production came in three games against inferior competition without a need to show much of a pass-rushing repertoire. He doesn’t show much of what the NFL looks for on special teams, and it’s difficult to project a position for him on the next level. For those reasons, Sam would project to be no better than a mid- to late-round pick. He could go undrafted. To my eyes Sam is decidedly average, with nothing exceptional about his game—though he will be helped by the fact that this draft is not deep with pass rushers, and those are always needed.

And that was before the combine.
 
Last edited:

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
Don't play dumb. By your own words in this thread, you => Sams with an award college = indication of a whole conference.

Are you trying to say that you did not say it?

Not in the way you try to rephrase it to suit your needs.

Let me summarize for you.

SEC is the best defensive conference in NCAAF.
Sam was SEC DPOY.
Every DPOY for the last 10-15 years make the NFL.

If those things are true, Sam should be in the NFL.

If Sam is not in the NFL, something else must be factor, or one of the previous things must not be true. If one of those things is not true, what is it? What did you get from that? OMG SEC ROCKS FU me butthurt.

Or just reread Cronos's posts earlier in the day.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
Not in the way you try to rephrase it to suit your needs.

Let me summarize for you.

SEC is the best defensive conference in NCAAF.
Sam was SEC DPOY.
Every DPOY for the last 10-15 years make the NFL.

If those things are true, Sam should be in the NFL.

If Sam is not in the NFL, something else must be factor, or one of the previous things must not be true. If one of those things is not true, what is it? What did you get from that? OMG SEC ROCKS FU me butthurt.

Or just reread Cronos's posts earlier in the day.

Excuses, excuses, and more excuses. Others can read your posts and see for themselves, I already provided your own posts about how you lied several times before.

And now you are a liar again. You were the ONE that brag about the Pac12 as "superior" and trash the SEC as "overrated/average/mediocre" and then brag about how you could do as good a job as NFL GMs.

Did you see me trash the Pac12 or other conferences as you did, brag about my ability as you did, and then brag about the SEC as "SEC ROCKS" as you claimed? Go ahead and quote what I said. Pathetic LIAR!!! Who is the asshole that butthurt again? Remember how you LIED about you only mentioned the SEC AFTER I mentioned Russel and I pointed out that you trashtalk way before that? LIAR!!!

And did you see the part about "AWARD IN COLLEGE MEANS NOTHING IN THE NFL" mentioned in my links and several posters several times? What part of that you do not understand? What part of that that you do not understand?

Now beat it.
 
Last edited:

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
You could say by and large he became DPOY based on leading the SEC in sacks. However, if you were to check the game logs/stats for 2013, he recorded 9 of this 11.5 in three games against rather inferior opponents (Arkansas St., Vanderbilt and Florida). He had 2.5 sacks in the other 11 games. It'd be interesting to see his PFF grades compared to Kony Ealy for 2013 if they existed. Many thought he wasn't even the second best DE on the team.

Oh hey. Someone reviewed his 2013 season: http://mmqb.si.com/2014/02/13/michael-sam-film-study-nfl-draft



And that was before the combine.

49ers GM thought otherwise

lol

Anyways, you would think people picking an award would take how he got his sacks into account. I think the draft profiles did, including the one you linked

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1700418/michael-sam
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/michael-sam?id=2543734

No one report has him a world beater, but most projected him as late draft pick, and he should at least be able to latch on somewhere as a special teamer or practice squad at the worst. And this is after he came out to world. His reports were decided better before that. But assuming the later reports and more accurate, it could make you question his DPOY award. Then you see Shane Ray, a fellow Tiger playing the same position, with almost the same measurables, close stats, and the same SEC DPOY award, was drafted in the first round. He was even busted for weed days before the draft.

I'm sure there are things you could point to when you really break them both down, but the difference between 1st round and 7th round, and starting rookie to not making the CFL, cant be that great.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,450
7
81
Excuses, excuses, and more excuses. Others can read your posts and see for themselves, I already provided your own posts about how you lied several times before.

And now you are a liar again. You were the ONE that brag about the Pac12 as "superior" and trash the SEC as "overrated/average/mediocre".

Did you see me trash the Pac12 or other conferences as you did and then brag about the SEC as "SEC ROCKS" as you claimed? Go ahead and quote what I said. Pathetic LIAR!!! Who is the asshole that butthurt again? Remember how you LIED about you only mentioned the SEC AFTER I mentioned Russel and I pointed out that you trashtalk way before that? LIAR!!!

And did you see the part about "AWARD IN COLLEGE MEANS NOTHING IN THE NFL" mentioned in my links and several posters several times? What part of that you do not understand?

Now beat it.

I'm sure other posters have read our exchanges, and I dont anyone has come to your conclusion about what I said about the conferences. You dont even appear to know what sarcasm and hyperbole is, even when I provide links for you. Had I known I was responding to an irrational person with mental deficiencies in the first few replies, I would have typed out and bolded "sarcasm here". "Hyperbole here".

I will spare you from my many lies by putting you on ignore. But then again, I might be lying, so you'll never know for sure. I could be planning another lie right now...
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
I'm sure other posters have read our exchanges, and I dont anyone has come to your conclusion about what I said about the conferences. You dont even appear to know what sarcasm and hyperbole is, even when I provide links for you. Had I known I was responding to an irrational person with mental deficiencies in the first few replies, I would have typed out and bolded "sarcasm here". "Hyperbole here".

I will spare you from my many lies by putting you on ignore. But then again, I might be lying, so you'll never know for sure. I could be planning another lie right now...

You said what you said, now own up to it. No need to back track with "sarcasm" "hyperbole" or other bullshit excuses. Say what you mean and mean what you say.

Again, did you see me trashtalk the Pac12 as you did with the SEC way back in post 9? Yes or No? Did you see me brag about my football prowess as you did? Yes or No?

Funny how overwhelmingly number of posters disagree with you and not with me. Of course, they are just chumps and not as good as any NFL GMs as you, right? LOL.

Unbelievable.
 

smackababy

Lifer
Oct 30, 2008
27,024
79
86
49ers GM thought otherwise

lol

Anyways, you would think people picking an award would take how he got his sacks into account. I think the draft profiles did, including the one you linked

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1700418/michael-sam
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/michael-sam?id=2543734

No one report has him a world beater, but most projected him as late draft pick, and he should at least be able to latch on somewhere as a special teamer or practice squad at the worst. And this is after he came out to world. His reports were decided better before that. But assuming the later reports and more accurate, it could make you question his DPOY award. Then you see Shane Ray, a fellow Tiger playing the same position, with almost the same measurables, close stats, and the same SEC DPOY award, was drafted in the first round. He was even busted for weed days before the draft.

I'm sure there are things you could point to when you really break them both down, but the difference between 1st round and 7th round, and starting rookie to not making the CFL, cant be that great.

The issue is, everyone projected him as a special teams or a practice squad player. He got the chance to prove his worth TWICE and then was asked to come BACK for a third chance at the vet combine, where his already unimpressive measurables got worse.

So, as you like to point at, someone with the same measurables was drafted before him and has a spot, perhaps it is Sam's attitude? Did you not read Chad Hennings wiki page? There are multiple reasons he could not have made it, if we take away his measurables and performances. Being gay MIGHT be one, but it isn't likely considering how he has acted.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,852
29,647
146
hahaha Out of curiosity, would that matter? And why the hell are you guys so against me on this...are you religious fundamentalists or something?



Aldon Smith is exceptional. Since you read the first page, you might have read that I thought he probably wasnt good enough to be gay and play in the NFL. The first one to do that will have to be exceptional, not just good enough. Too many guys are just good enough, so why deal with the hassles involved with a person in his situation. Losing the locker room is just about the worst thing a team can do.

In your defense, Childs, there is the case of someone like Tim Tebow, who so very clearly is not good enough for the NFL, yet certain coaches and teams, fanbois, and most certainly the media spent a season and a half crawling over themselves to make every case possible that he deserves to be in the NFL.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |