- Feb 11, 2005
- 7,947
- 2
- 0
To achieve a certain speed, say on flat terrain, a 6 cylander would have to work less than a 4 cylander, correct? So why not get better gas mileage?
Originally posted by: Accipiter22
To achieve a certain speed, say on flat terrain, a 6 cylander would have to work less than a 4 cylander, correct? So why not get better gas mileage?
Originally posted by: desy
more moving parts means more friction mechanical loses etc.
The gas engine isn't 100% effecient to start so muliplying cylinders magnifies the loses.
Added vehicle wieght unless you remove something elsewher to keep the GVW the same and on and on
Originally posted by: Accipiter22
To achieve a certain speed, say on flat terrain, a 6 cylander would have to work less than a 4 cylander, correct? So why not get better gas mileage?
Originally posted by: iwantanewcomputer
i don't know anything about the relationships of torque produced, cylinder number, and fuel consumption of an internal combustion engine, but i am going to post something I just made up based on my limited scientific knowledge that sounds technical.
Originally posted by: Caecus Veritas
this is actually true in the case of the Jeep Wrangler. the 4 banger (which i owned) had way worse milage than a 6 banger's listed milage)... this, i assume, was due to the 4-cy engine having to work overtime to overcome the car's boxy aero-dynamics.
Originally posted by: infestedgh0st
Originally posted by: desy
more moving parts means more friction mechanical loses etc.
The gas engine isn't 100% effecient to start so muliplying cylinders magnifies the loses.
Added vehicle wieght unless you remove something elsewher to keep the GVW the same and on and on
actually, the most efficient internal combustion engine design is the i6 and v12. Friction counts very little in terms of efficiency (motor oil anybody?). Newer engines now usually have lighter internals, which is a big contribution to engine efficiency.
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: Accipiter22
To achieve a certain speed, say on flat terrain, a 6 cylander would have to work less than a 4 cylander, correct? So why not get better gas mileage?
Assuming all other things equals (weight, wind drag, etc...), it has to ignite more gas to operate the extra 2 cylinders so no.