PrometheusN,
I've had the MSI 655 board longer than the ASUS and Gigabyte boards by about a week. I experienced several BIOS issues with the MSI board that delayed the review quite a bit. I had to work with MSI for several hours before we finally got a good BIOS and board. Our advertising is handled by a completely separate company btw, all I do is get boards from manufacturers, run lots of tests, and put out the review as early as possible. That's why MSI's review was first, I got it first and therefore had more time to work on it.
With the Gigabyte 655 board, I did benchmarking and stress testing with two different BIOSes (M01 and M04) before I finally got an acceptable BIOS for the review (M05). This took up considerable time. I'm done with Gigabyte's board, I have no idea why Anand hasn't posted the review yet.
ASUS's 655 board hasn't had any BIOS issues or otherwise. Unfortunately, my contact at ASUS didn't notice that there weren?t any DIP switches onboard when he sent me the sample, meaning I can't do my usual round of overclocking with this particular version of ASUS's 655 board.
All these problems have delayed AnandTech?s 655 coverage greatly. Notice that there are very few reviews of 655 boards to begin with, and this is almost certainly because most 655 samples sent out to review web sites have either had an immature BIOS or some other growing pains. You would be seeing lots of 655 reviews if the samples review web sites received were trouble free. For the record, I usually don?t have to go through this much trouble to get out a review of a particular chipset. This lag time isn?t the norm you know.
Btw, I don't have any KT400A boards at all, I?m waiting on Soltek and Gigabyte boards. I started a KT400A thread so that people can post their suggestions for the review. If these threads create too much anticipation, I can always stop posting them.