Skylake-K SKUs leaked

[mikk]

http://www.pcfrm.com/intel-i7-6700k-vs-i7-4790k/

Some benchmarks. They wrote Cinebench R15 but it's obviously R11.5. Comparison: http://us.hardware.info/reviews/544...r-overclockers!-benchmarks-igpu-cinebench-115

~15% faster. Game benchmarks too much bottlenecked from the GPU apparently.

 

[Arachnotronic]

Very respectable boost. 15% improvement over 4790K is nothing to sneeze at.

 

[Gundark]

I understood that the mainboards aren't ready for a couple of months yet. On what did they test it?

 

[ShintaiDK]

That looks to be in the upper end of my expectations. Very nice!

 

[scannall]

I understood that the mainboards aren't ready for a couple of months yet. On what did they test it?

Engineering samples most likely.

 

[ehume]

I call FAKE on the specs for Skylake

Skylake: i7 6700K
4.0-4.2GHz - 4 Cores - 95W TDP

Haswell: i7 4790K
4.0-4.4GHz - 4 Cores - 88W TDP

Gone is supposedly the IVR from the chip. That should shave away some TDP from the CPU.
We are now at 14nm vs 22nm. Which should give HUGE benefits TDP wise.

According to those specs the TDP have actually increased 7W while clock have gone down 200MHz?
Nah, not buying that at all

Since the Skylake chips are denser than the 22nm CPU's maybe the thermal density effect at high clocks has finally caught up with us. So SK runs cooler at lower clocks, but heat up faster after a certain point. Makes sense, IMO.

 

[erunion]

Leaked slides of this type have been proven accurate year after year.
Calling them fake because you expected different numbers is just silly.

(These specs will end up being proven accurate).