OverVolt
Lifer
- Aug 31, 2002
- 14,278
- 89
- 91
The point is the other measuring devices (eye monitoring, EEG leads, etc.) are to gather additional information which can suggest type of sleep apnea (obstructive, central, mixed) which can be managed differently and to better titrate therapy. It's really not as cut and dry as you may think.
Of course your right, and many people with obstructive sleep apnea would get better with weight loss .. but patients, generally, don't lose weight. They just don't. It's not an effective treatment modality.
Well, obviously. What's the point in screening for disease you can't treat? It's not tin foil hat stuff. Are you equally surprised that we've started screening for more cancers as we've developed more cancer therapies? Are you surprised that the CDC started recommending the baby boomers be screen for Hep C once far more benign oral curative therapies were developed?
Healthcare is the only industry where innovation actually increases costs. I'll never forget hearing that. How do other countries handle sleep apnea I wonder?
Enabling people to be obese isn't exactly a great healthcare strategy. Like 1/3rd the population is obese now.