Originally posted by: Acanthus
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
71% is still pretty darn good I agree. But the point is to be accurate and avoid exaggeration right?
Originally posted by: Acanthus
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Originally posted by: Mrvile
Right, but is 71% worth the extra money? Too lazy to do the math.
Sure, you may only have the cash to buy one card right now, but in a year when ATI releases their next new thing are you going to spend *another* $400 for the next new card, or are you going to buy the now "Budget" 6800 and get almost as good performance?
Originally posted by: Mrvile
I hate waiting. I wanna buy upfront. Arg.
Originally posted by: Mrvile
Well Apo, how long till games start straining the power of twin 6800GTs? As long as they are able to live and play well for another 5 years (I'm sure they will), its well worth the price.
Originally posted by: XBoxLPU
What a bunch of idiots
You are compairing two cards to just one card...
Originally posted by: IamTHEsnake
I think ATi may have an Ace up their sleave.... I heard a couple weeks ago that they have developed a technology that allows PCI-Express cards to use system memory and cut back on GDDR size. The amount of ram on a Vidcard is responsible for a big chunk of the price, get rid of that and the price will also be less. So performance may be the same or near the same for less than say an equally powerful vidcard without the HypepMemory Tech. However, i still think ATi should create something to the idea of SLi.
Originally posted by: XBoxLPU
if you read the AT article, games are not straining the power of twin 6800GTs...... it is the CPU