I went to Smashburger the other day, and it was okay. The burger wasn't as good as Five Guys. Smashburger puts too much of certain toppings (such as onions) on it. I considered grilled onions, but I balked when their nutrition facts listed them as adding 110 calories... . I wasn't sure why until I saw how many they give you. Sweet baby Jesus, the onions take up almost as much volume as the beef itself.
One thing I do have to say is... their
smashfries (note: not the regular fries) beat the pants off Five Guys' fries. Five Guys' fries are just too bland and boring, and I don't care much for the cajun fries (at Five Guys). For some reason, Smashburger also charges 50 cents more for cajun fries... is it really that hard to season fries?
I do think that Smashburger is more expensive as well, but I think that's also on purpose. As one of my coworkers put it, it's like a mix between Cheeburger Cheeburger and Five Guys, and it comes with the premium. The
biggest benefit to Smashburger is that unlike Five Guys, they actually have chicken sandwiches. If you still want a "burger" (I use that term very loosely here) and fries, you can save ~200 calories by going with chicken instead of beef. Helps to make up for the grilled onions!
Wait, they served you undercooked hamburger the first time?! That's incredibly dumb and risky.
I've always been confused by this. My coworkers and I go out to eat for lunch often, and most places let you choose how to cook your burger. I've always been told that pink is fine for
cuts of meat, because the inside is not exposed to air, but that
isn't true for ground meat. Since burgers are made from ground meat, you would want it to be fully cooked.
Is that right?