I can see I touched a nerve beyond my initial intentions, so I'll hit on some points if you allow yourself to remove your emotions and look back at your assumptions you made to generate this novel :
- Did I ever mention anything about StarFox 2? I don't really care about it and is not my main driving force for buying the thing. I made no claim I owned it, will download it, or anything else for that matter... so you're asking for something that was never brought up.
Ahem.
Sorry. Something in my throat. Anyway.. remember this?
I would love to pay for it, but if Nintendo doesn't make enough how can I? I already did pay for all this crap at some point, I unfortunately gave it away to a family member when I outgrew it and got the next console. That still doesn't make it right, but the whole point is that this argument is moot as long as Nintendo doesn't hose us again.
Oh yeah. It was your justification for why it's OK for you to pirate the games rather than buy them again, even though you half-heartedly admit that it isn't justification in the same breath. Not only are we getting ahead of ourselves regarding availability (it hasn't launched yet), we completely shifted gears from [why it's OK to promote piracy as an alternative to others in general] to [why it's personally OK for you in your unique position].
You glossed over a specific title to support a point which doesn't work when you are forced to address the part you conveniently/deliberately ignored. I put a spotlight on it to counter your point. What other games did you previously not own?
The thing is, downloading games you did not previously own wasn't the problem I had. I take issue with encouraging others to not pay who otherwise would. That's a good way to make sure we never see more lost releases or long-demanded sequels. Nintendo finally did something here that adds real value no matter how many of these games we used to own and yet people are being encouraged not to support that.
I am ecstatic that Nintendo finally released Earthbound Beginnings (Mother) some years back. I was excited when they finally released Sin & Punishment before that. I'm stoked to see that we're finally going to get Starfox 2. What future titles might we miss out on if the reaction to this is dampened by consumers turning to illegitimate emulation instead? No Mother 3 localization/translation? What about future titles that might get made if the public reacts positively to something like this? The world might miss out on something like Mother 4. Please don't try to turn willing buyers away from something like this just because the illegitimate option is cheap/free/comprehensive.
- What about what I posted made you think I was superior? I understand it's hard to judge tone over text, but I really don't get it.
Again...
If you were honestly asking the question instead of pretending that it had no answer...
You came at us with the same "I know something you don't know" approach that the rPi people flaunted in every single Classic Edition discussion I've ever seen. That's every YT comment section for a video that mentions the Classic Edition consoles... every G+ post... every Facebook post... every Anandtech thread... even every thread in the collector/enthusiast community forums.
I don't think enthusiast bicycle communities have to deal with motorcyclists in their midsts constantly telling them that they are all stupid because "Don't you know? A Ninja 250 MOTORCYCLE is faster and cheaper, plus you don't have to pedal and they can go anywhere a car can go! Just get a motorcycle."
As for your tone, that's the same "playing dumb" I referred to in the same post.
Just like last time: all the rPi promoters keep playing dumb with the "I don't understand" BS. "I got it all for free"...
"Do you know?" belongs on the list.
It either presumes that we obviously wouldn't be as interested as we are if we knew what you know or it asserts yourself by rubbing your choice in our faces with claims that it is superior. The others doing this also say "it's easy" in a thinly veiled variation of the "you're all stupid for being excited about this and wanting to spend money on it when there's this cheap/free and easy illegitimate alternative."
- I never said I was a classic console enthusiast... again, you're making up stuff to be mad about that isn't there. I don't know about the attitude about others talking about this subject, but I never came from an attitude of superiority. I think the arguments you've had in the past are being projected onto me now, and you're lumping any and all posts regarding the rPi into the same bucket. If somebody in the past tried to argue that the rPi is better, I can't help that. My point was that it merely exists.
They sure are, which is why I made it clear that you're part of a long line of people doing this. Also, yes, I am arguing against the lot of you. I explicitly lumped you together with them before I started my tirade against all of you.
Did it ever cross your mind that because I'm NOT an enthusiast, I actually DIDN'T know about the rPi emulation until right now? And that my "did you guys know..." comment was made out of literally sheer ignorance on my part, and nothing to do with all the conspiracy theory BS you're spewing about me thinking it's a better option.
Oh, you might have been able to claim that before you posted this...
I had a 50/50 shot that you would be the first one to say something like this.
You guys are fun
If that wasn't admission enough that you're deliberately poking the beehive with a stick, you responded directly to me with this:
If by posture you mean get a rise out of the classic console brothers, than I agree
Ichi didn't hold ground as loudly, but you made up for it.
Again: I've seen it countless times... not even just in Classic Edition discussions. It's the same for movie and app pirates. "You paid for that app?! Pbbbbt. I know how to get ALL my apps for FREE." Cut it out. It not just getting old, it's more obnoxious than me.
I don't have a strong passion about classic gaming, I truly don't past a little sting of nostalgia which passes quickly when I realize how bored I am with the games I played decades ago. The main reason I was interested in this is because those are the games my fiancé is comfortable with, and it seemed like a very good option to get her into gaming together. When I googled it some links about the Pi came out, and I already had one from a previous project so it caught my attention. I'm sure the discussion happened when the NES classic came out, but I wasn't paying attention at the time because an NES doesn't interest me. SNES definitely does.
That's nice. Guess you came across the same BS I am talking about that infiltrated every prior conversation and decided to propagate it exactly the way I have a problem with. Guess that means I
shouldn't object? :/ Did you watch John Rigg's video I linked in my first reply? Clearly, this frustrates a lot of us...
even rPi owners.
You've successfully ranted under the assumption that I was an enthusiast who wanted to be superior and you spent an incredible amount of energy proving that you were the bigger enthusiast for some reason. In reality I'm a guy who literally just heard about rPi emulation, and didn't even know StarFox 2 wasn't a released game until now. You may have made other points, but my eyes glazed over when you started posting pics of raggety old carts for some reason. I don't know if that makes you feel better or worse about this situation, but I thought I'd recap.
Yeah. I'm not surprised that you didn't know about Starfox 2, but you sure seemed to imply that you once owned "all" of these when dismissing the value of going legit. The problem isn't what you know or not. It's about attempting to shame us into not buying this product legitimately just because an illegitimately free/cheap alternative exists and then distorting reality to support your position.
My pics were calling attention to just how hollow your claim of legitimately having "all" the games really was by inviting you to show us pics of your unobtanium Starfox 2 prototype. To egg you on and to demonstrate that anyone who had such things in the past would have retained documentation of it, I showed some unobtanium myself. It's not so much the claim that I care about: Of course you never had a legit Starfox 2 prototype. It's the attempt to justify stealing the games that I was calling out.
(side note: I previously referred to you as one of the "classic console brothers"... isn't that a sign that I already KNEW what a fan you were? I didn't realize how wildly arrogant you were about it though, so I guess I did learn something)
Yeah. You also implied that you were trolling for a response. Guess you weren't really expecting one (?).
It's funny how you claimed nobody cares about him setting up his PI to play emulated games then go and post an essay of all this retro shit you have, even taking pictures with his name on it, like anyone cares about that stuff...
I didn't even notice that. Huh... well the amount of time he's dedicated to me (or a misspelled me anyway) this week makes me feel pretty warm inside.
Notice that the Sharpie used to write your name is different than the Sharpie used to write mine? That's because I didn't spend even a millisecond of time or effort to write my name in response to you or this thread. The sticky note already had my name on it because *gasp* I used it to take pictures and document other recent pick-ups in case of theft!
Does this looks familiar? It should! That's because it is the same sticky note pad I used to document that pick-up earlier this week.
http://nintendoage.com/forum/messageview.cfm?StartRow=751&catid=31&threadid=173205
I literally just added your name and pointed Tapatalk at it.
Oh, look! Even more pick-ups documented from this past weekend:
I took that for a group member who specifically asked for it.
Looks like sharing pick-ups is a pretty routine thing among collectors and that might be why we have such pictures readily available. Glad I could clear that up.
Why might I need my name in the pic to prove my collection is actually my collection in the future? Oh, I dunno... insurance, theft, or historical purposes that matter to other collectors. You know: the obvious stuff that has nothing specifically to do with you. I took exactly two pictures for this thread and the rest were already shared elsewhere. The only reason I took those two pictures is because, after seeing that I didn't have them to link to, I realized I still needed to document them in case I needed them in the future. Rectified.
Does it make you happy or sad to learn that I had additional reason for sharing them that wasn't purely motivated by our conversation?