Originally posted by: Lonyo
The smoking thing is a bit much with a baby in the house, but most of the rest of the stuff I read before getting bored doesn't seem unreasonable, especially if she's not paying rent.
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Your poll is total BS. Add some in-between options for actual optionions.
Your actions are totally BS. YOu invite a woman with child to live with you and her complaining about you smoking isn't legit? Give me a break.
Originally posted by: irishScott
Originally posted by: Philippine Mango
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
Originally posted by: irishScott
To do so is forcing the kid to smoke and inhale 2x the tar you do, which the kid cannot control.
So, I'm safer to smoke firsthand than secondhand? Sweet, I'll go buy a pack.
buhahaha, agreed, it makes no sense to say that second hand smoking is worse than first hand, yes it can be bad but noway worse.. ****** just the logic in that the smoker too has to breathe the air filled with smoke should show that second hand smoking can't be worse than first hand...
Smoke in fresh air, friend is near by, picks up smoke.
Smoke inside, friend is near by, picks up smoke and you pick up smoke... You're still going to be inhaling more than the second hand smoker...
Read my quotes on and at the bottom of page 4. PWNAGE!!!!
More a point of hysteria inducing facts without a very simple disclaimer:
The vast majority of ETS in a room will never enter your lungs. The concentration of smoke you inhale as ETS is far, FAR lower than that of the smoker.
So while the ETS itself may be have higher parts per million of dangerous chemicals, the parts per million inhaled is far, FAR lower because the ETS is dispersed in the air and severely diluted.
In the end, it's a useless "fact." Because it does not tell you the concentration a person inhales in a given environment.
And this is even more pronounced outside, where just a whiff of smoke is far less dangerous to you than the sunlight you're standing in, and the exhaust fumes from cars, trucks and power stations you're breathing.
Is ETS dangerous to people genetically prone to cancer and heart disease? Probably, but only in highly concentrated amounts in enclosed spaces with poor ventilation, heavy smokers and long term daily exposure. Anyone who makes health claims when faced with brief occasional exposure outside or in well ventilated areas is being absurd.
Hmm, how much do you want to bet? How about $100?Originally posted by: saymyname
You guys are both sick individuals. You tried to be nice but I'll bet money that you thought you were going to get laid by doing so and never did so we now hear this version of events.
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
You should buy your buddy a hooker, and yourself a set of balls
Originally posted by: yllus
Hmm, how much do you want to bet? How about $100?Originally posted by: saymyname
You guys are both sick individuals. You tried to be nice but I'll bet money that you thought you were going to get laid by doing so and never did so we now hear this version of events.
I was thinking the same thing.Originally posted by: NaOH
Originally posted by: everman
You never should have let her live there AND use your car for free in the first place, wtf were you thinking?
I can't help but think he wanted something else in return (nookie)
Originally posted by: irishScott
Originally posted by: xgsound
I'm sure I'm older than most of the ATers, but I am still surprised by the amount of comments that smoking around the baby is so terrible. By the discription of the childs current home life, parental example, and lack of a current address, I don't see how smoking becomes a measurable issue.
When I was a kid almost noone had a "smoke free" house. The 2 or 3 "smoke free" households I recall up until I was about 30 were the biggest jerks around. Times have changed alot in that regard, but this childs life would have to improve 1,000% for smoking to be a problem worth considering on any level.
It's a good thing she wasn't paying rent, because there could be legal issues to getting her removed if she was.
Good luck to all concerned.
Jim
There's a reason my generation (born 1987) has a longer life expectancy than the previous one.
There's also the fact that your inhaling so much sh!T it's pathetic. And when you smoke in public you force us non-smokers to inhale twice as much (5x in the case of CO) sh!t as you do.
One of the things that kept me from smoking is that I knew I would harm people, let alone harming myself. Did you know that smokers and people exposed to smoke in general live shorter lives with more health complications? I dunno about you, but that's something I want to avoid for myself and my future kids.
I'm not saying that not smoking in the house will make a home-life perfect, but as far as physical conditions go, a non-smoking household is drastically better than a smoking household.
Originally posted by: Ilmater
I was thinking the same thing.Originally posted by: NaOH
Originally posted by: everman
You never should have let her live there AND use your car for free in the first place, wtf were you thinking?
I can't help but think he wanted something else in return (nookie)
As stated before, the smoking is a WTF for me... you should know when you bring a baby into your apartment that you are giving up SOME things. She should be kind enough to pick up baby stuff from time to time when she's living rent-free AND getting the benefit of using your car. As for the cats, dude, why didn't you have ground rules going in that you wouldn't take cats? Just tell her, listen, you can have all of this, but no cats.
- You were right to kick her out
- She is crazy and clearly not fit to be a parent
- You're from KC? Me too! Women here are crazy!
Originally posted by: amdforever2
Baby was in a bedroom off of the living room.
Door shut.
Yet still, at 3 am, the cancer scare apparently had to be addressed with my friends.
I don't even smoke myself.
Originally posted by: Lonyo
The smoking thing is a bit much with a baby in the house, but most of the rest of the stuff I read before getting bored doesn't seem unreasonable, especially if she's not paying rent.
Originally posted by: everman
You never should have let her live there AND use your car for free in the first place, wtf were you thinking?