Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: dfi
Ok, trying to reach some common ground. Most would agree that human slavery is wrong - humans are not property to be owned. We've established that both humans and cats are sentient beings, but cats do not share the same rights as humans. Because cats have less rights than humans, cats can be treated in ways that broadly resemble slavery. So are cats property?
this is becoming absurd in a way...i said slavery in a broad sense, but not that it broadly resembles slavery. It really has nothing much to do with slavery, other than you possess ownership/leadership over the animal.
t seems to fit closely with my definition of slaver
Cats and Dogs as a group look to their humans as a leader...they give in to being submissive and a follower.
However, this is a relationship almost as old as time; and a valuable one. Animals have rights definitely...more than slaves ever did in the worst of times.
In slavery, you were taking a person that could have been just as good as anyone and binding them to service. If it was a woman, you could rape her. Animals are protected even with that. Animals cannot be land owners, voters, want to go to school, etc...they do not want to be.
However, an animal is not a yard ordament or a soccer ball when you get p1ssed.
They are technically natural companions. In our more comfortable modern times, their lives have gotten equally easy. In days of old, dogs helped find game, protect property/livestock, etc. Cats kept vermin at bay mostly. Both sometimes ate an occasional livestock item.
Today they are simply friends always available. They are relaxing and have been proven to extend our lives. Life extension is probably one of the most valuable things in existance.
The bonus is these furry guys do this for just room and board and sometimes even less than that.