Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: HamburgerBoy
Originally posted by: dug777
This is a party at his house, with his friends...a reasonable degree of care would of call be expected of everyone there, and that would inculde taking extra special care when moving about given teh knowledge they all had that the kitten was there...
Why should they? The cat isn't their property. If she doesn't want her property to be damaged, she shouldn't leave it in the middle of a ****** staircase.
I don't think it's worth arguing with you HB
That said, i'll try to reason with you. You are still liable for destroying or damaging things that are put in what you would consider to be a stupid place, if you had a reasonable knowledge that the object was there/might be there and you don't take reasonable care.
You can't just destroy things because you think they're in a daft place, i assume even your very basic knowledge of the law recognises that?
Now, the girl wants me to pay her (she hasn't said how much) and is majorly pissed off. Honestly I want to say fck her, I broke my ankle and she's just being a bitch, it's not my responsibility she brought her retarded cat in the first place.
What do you guys think?
Update: Clover is dead. The girl just sent me a fax with a picture of the kitten and a message generously strewn with obscenities. I think she is going crazy.
Originally posted by: Noirish
she should've taken care of the cat.
you can pay half the vet cost out of goodwill.
you can pay half toward a new cat out of goodwill.
if that relationship is severed due to the cat, maybe the goodwill is redundant.
Originally posted by: Ulfhednar
You're both at fault. Her for bringing it, you for giving permission to let it loose.
Were I in your position, I would've sent her home with it.
Originally posted by: Seer
1) The girl should not be placing a monetary value on the kitten's life, which was priceless.
Originally posted by: veggz
Backstory: I had invited a whole bunch of people to hang out at my condo, including a certain friend who had a three-month old kitten that she brought along since I suppose she wanted to show it off. Anyway, after the gals had given up admiring the thing she set it loose with my permission. A little while later I was headed down to the kitchen to grab a few more beers, admittedly not really watching where I was going, when I stepped on something soft and warm going down the stairs, stumbling and falling down the stairs headfirst, spraining my ankle.
When I looked up I saw the stupid cat not moving where I had stepped a moment ago and a bit of blood on the carpet. Of course the girl freaked and we rushed the kitten to the vet where it has been since then. The vet says it's highly unlikely the cat will make it through the night.
Now, the girl wants me to pay her (she hasn't said how much) and is majorly pissed off. Honestly I want to say fck her, I broke my ankle and she's just being a bitch, it's not my responsibility she brought her retarded cat in the first place.
What do you guys think?
Update: Clover is dead. The girl just sent me a fax with a picture of the kitten and a message generously strewn with obscenities. I think she is going crazy.
Originally posted by: Seer
Just chiming in with another opinion here:
50/50 blame in this case.
1) The girl should not be placing a monetary value on the kitten's life, which was priceless. One should not demand nor expect recompensation for such things.
2) You DID step on it AND say that it was okay for it to roam around.
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: Seer
Just chiming in with another opinion here:
50/50 blame in this case.
1) The girl should not be placing a monetary value on the kitten's life, which was priceless. One should not demand nor expect recompensation for such things.
2) You DID step on it AND say that it was okay for it to roam around.
She probably put a monetary price on the vet bill she had to pay... Are some of you people awake?
Originally posted by: skreet
I find this is a very hard topic to form an opinion on. Is she just demanding large sums of money and swearing at you like an immature btch? Or is she demanding that you buy her a new kitten and give her your deepest apologies?
In the least you do owe her an apology. With a small kitten running around it's your duty (drunk or not) to watch where you're walking.
I don't think she owes you a cent for your ankle, if that were a question. When you walk down stairs, you look for objects blocking the way. Kitten or Non-Kitten objects alike.
I think she's being very immature to fax you a picture of a dead cat and demand money and call you names. Accidents happen. Accidents resulting in death can also happen.
Can we get an age range, out of curiosity? I'd like to know the maturity level of who we're dealing with here OP and girl.
- My 2.5 cents.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: dfi
I don't think I have stretched the definition of slavery, have I? Slavery is the condition of being in a position of servitude and bondage as the property of another. If I own a dog that I use to help herd sheeps, and the dog is not allowed the freedom to wonder from the household at leisure, then the relationship I have with the dog fits closely with my definition of slavery. You may love your dog, and your dog may love you as well. Does that change the relationship?
Right or wrong is subjective. Owning a dog as property, whether for companionship or work, is largely accepted in our society. If humans were owned as property by another advanced species, we would certainly consider it to be "wrong". But that advanced species might consider it mundane and acceptable, or "right".
You can knock yourself out with 'your discovery or enlightenment'. Just google 'slavery animal domestication' and have a fun-filled PETA day.
Unfortunately, animals are not looked on as the same as humans. They do have some laws that protect them better, but the penalties are much lower. Also you can easily euthasize a pet, you can't do so with humans.
You can apply slavery to a lot of things.
Originally posted by: dfi
Simple question, are pets property? I feel like I keep asking this basic question, without a clear response one way or the other. Do you consider your pet to be your companion and your property? If so, does this contradict the original quote that sentient beings are not property?
?