Originally posted by: skreet
Can we get an age range, out of curiosity? I'd like to know the maturity level of who we're dealing with here OP and girl.
Originally posted by: veggz
Shadow, you come in here guns blazing spamming your propaganda like no tomorrow and yet you accuse me of being obnoxious? Please son...Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Again, legally you would lose, and that is really all that matters. If you won't pay at least half, she could easily sue you in small claims... all your obnoxious comments won't be worth a damn there : ). Better yet, I'd love for you to make a fool out of yourself on Judge Judy!
Originally posted by: veggz
Backstory: I had invited a whole bunch of people to hang out at my condo
Originally posted by: veggz
Now, the girl wants me to pay her (she hasn't said how much) and is majorly pissed off.
Update: Clover is dead. The girl just sent me a fax with a picture of the kitten and a message generously strewn with obscenities. I think she is going crazy.
Originally posted by: Raduque
Originally posted by: dfi
Simple question, are pets property? I feel like I keep asking this basic question, without a clear response one way or the other. Do you consider your pet to be your companion and your property? If so, does this contradict the original quote that sentient beings are not property?
?
It's simple: My pets are not my property. They're my friends, my companions, they're non-human sentients which share my home with me. I take care of them and look after them, because they aren't fully capable of doing it themselves in this world of humans. If somebody harmed or killed them, I would go after that person with the full wrath of somebody who's human loved ones had been harmed or killed.
My pets are not property, which is why I told the state of West Virginia to go fvck itself when they tried to charge me personal property taxes for my dogs.
Originally posted by: dfi
Ok, forget the word slavery. Too many connotations and history that people can't seem to part with. I wonder if slavery is a term that can only be applied to humans, but that's another discussion.
Simple question, are pets property? I feel like I keep asking this basic question, without a clear response one way or the other. Do you consider your pet to be your companion and your property? If so, does this contradict the original quote that sentient beings are not property?
Btw, what "discovery" or "enlightenment" are you talking about? And I'm not sure how PETA enters the equation; I believe they are ok with people owning pets, yes? I googled your words can the first link was mostly related to animals being used in entertainment, which is something PETA stands against per their website. I didn't see anything about pets though.
Also, I'm not a member of PETA or affiliate with them in any ways. I personally own a pet as well, and love eating meat. I'm not sure where you were going - perhaps trying to discredit my questions by associating me with PETA?