It is just you.Originally posted by: Yeti101
Is it me, or does it seem like 4/5 out of the topics on this page are about AMD's.... All asking whats better for overclocking, when its hard to get a stable 200mhz on ANY AMD cpu OC... I have nothing agianst AMD's, I have a athon 1.4, hrm.
Yeti
Originally posted by: Yeti101
I dont know about 400Mhz more..... Why dont you just get a 1.6, they're pretty much the same as a XP2000+: $123 p41.6a: $125, Then you can just OC the 1.6 to 2.4.... Why even waste $ on tring to OC AMD's... just my opinion, all the AMD OC talk is just.. funny "The nail polish way unlock Athons" "What would be better for OC'ing: 2000+ or the 2200+?"
Uh, an XP 2000+ will whoop a P4 1.6A at stock settings. You can buy a 1600+ for $60 at newegg, which should OC to 1.8GHz (400MHz/29% OC) which will be faster than the 2200+ (due to higher FSBs), so it will outperform a P4 2.2A, which costs $237 for a savings of around $165. I'm trying to see where that's a "waste of money". Even if you compare it to a 1.6A which will easily OC beyond 2.2GHz, they cost $160 (if you know of a place where you can buy a P4 1.6A for $125, let us know - they aren't even that cheap on pricewatch), so you're still saving around $90.
Originally posted by: Yeti101
Uh, an XP 2000+ will whoop a P4 1.6A at stock settings. You can buy a 1600+ for $60 at newegg, which should OC to 1.8GHz (400MHz/29% OC) which will be faster than the 2200+ (due to higher FSBs), so it will outperform a P4 2.2A, which costs $237 for a savings of around $165. I'm trying to see where that's a "waste of money". Even if you compare it to a 1.6A which will easily OC beyond 2.2GHz, they cost $160 (if you know of a place where you can buy a P4 1.6A for $125, let us know - they aren't even that cheap on pricewatch), so you're still saving around $90.
Your forgot something buddy, just like Duvie said "I can get my 1.6 at 2.736" and that will kick ANY AMD'S ass stright into the ground. EVEN if you can stably get a 1600+ to 1.8Ghz Clock speed....
Im saying, between a P41.6a vs. a XP1600+, the 1.6a will have better results if both were Overclocking Example: 1.6a OC'ed at 2.6Ghz vs a 1600+ at 1.8Ghz (If you can keep it stable)Yeti101 hehe did i hear you say above "Why dont you just get a 1.6, they're pretty much the same as a XP2000+: "??
Originally posted by: Duvie
I see where you are coming from CRAZY, very true on a lot of it.....Hope you can get a sl68q!!! My sl63x was a great ocer as it ran at default vcore at 2.4ghz (133fsb) and maxed at 2.63ghz with 1.71v...
Originally posted by: Yeti101
www.pricewatch.com serch: CPU > CPU > Pentium 4 1.6GHz Sock 478, Thats less then $125, $119.95, buddy.
Originally posted by: Yeti101
www.pricewatch.com serch: CPU > CPU > Pentium 4 1.6GHz Sock 478, Thats less then $125, $119.95, buddy.