The correct question is which economic policies were more in line with fascism vs capitalism.
If you can even ask the right question how do you expect the right answer?
Well why don't you please detail which nazi economic policies you think are more in line with free-market capitalism than socialsim
Which is why I then went on to detail their economic policies that were much more in line with socialism than free-market capitalism.
Actually anyone with a marginal knowledge of history would know that Nazi's were the National Socialist Party.
But hey in case that isn't enough for you:
:hmm:
The irrelevance of this talking points regurgitation to the current discussion shouldn't disguise that neither of these are at all accurate. No one's income tax was audited in the recent IRS wrong-doings. No journalist's phones were tapped in the recent AP thing, though logs of who they had called / received calls from were accessed, which is still a serious issue but a different one. Also, the AP thing had nothing to do with which party they were involved in (I thought all members of the *~liberal media~* were commies anyway?).
Well why don't you please detail which nazi economic policies you think are more in line with free-market capitalism than socialsim
Which is why I then went on to detail their economic policies that were much more in line with socialism than free-market capitalism.
Why don't you tell how a party that:
(1) claims to be socialist (including in the party name).
(2) opposed free market capitalism
(3) hate capitalism
(4) argued that capitalism damages nations
Or how about another quote from a party leader
Quote:
Another radical Nazi, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels adamantly stressed the socialist character of Nazism, and claimed in his diary that if he were to pick between Bolshevism and capitalism, he said "in final analysis", "it would be better for us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under capitalism."
So really tell us how Nazi's are not socialists?
The Nazis claimed that communism was dangerous to the well-being of nations because of its intention to dissolve private property, its support of class conflict, its aggression against the middle class, its hostility towards small businessmen, and its atheism.[152] Nazism rejected class conflict-based socialism and economic egalitarianism, favouring instead a stratified economy with social classes based on merit and talent, retaining private property, and the creation of national solidarity that transcends class distinction.[153]
During the 1920s, Hitler urged disparate Nazi factions to unite in opposition to "Jewish Marxism."[154] Hitler asserted that the "three vices" of "Jewish Marxism" were democracy, pacifism and internationalism.[155]
In 1930, Hitler said: "Our adopted term ‘Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxist Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true Socialism is not."[156] In 1942, Hitler privately said: "I absolutely insist on protecting private property ... we must encourage private initiative".[157]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22621833
Not that I like to see people suffering, however this is something for all those who praise socialism... :awe:
socialism has never worked and never will. Those idiots who vote for socialism now have to pay for their stupidity.
Hopefully this shuts up the idiots on here who want socialism.
So pay a teacher more, give kids more recess and less tests and they wil do better huh?
Your statement demonstrates a great deal of ignorance. Hitler's National Socialists and the German socialist party opposed each other, and Hitler actually defined National Socialism in terms of patriotism and militarism, with no references to socialism, a philosophy he hated.Actually anyone with a marginal knowledge of history would know that Nazi's were the National Socialist Party.
That's what they say
Why Finland's Unorthodox Education System Is The Best In The World
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/finlands-education-system-best-in-world-2012-11?op=1#ixzz2USRj6kqD
We absolutely have that luxury financially, the trick is that anti-intellectualism runs pretty deep in American culture and always has. As long as a sizable amount of the population sincerely doesn't believe that education is worth sacrificing for and something to be admired, rather than a threat to their political/religious beliefs, and as long as another (not mutually exclusive) set of the population is stuck in poverty for generations and have to work such hours they can't support their kids' educations, we're never going to have the home-life support that makes good education possible.
We pay teachers poorly relative to their education level in this country, then shit on them when test scores aren't great, as if they have full control there. Parents who understand the value of education are by far the most important factor, and a difficult thing for any policy initiative to affect.
Seems it's not what you spend but how you spend it.
Finland spends around 30 percent less per student than the United States.
Finland has less students per class.
Funny how all the countries mentioned on those images are small, undiverse countries with little economic power or international responsibility.
The United States is a hugely diverse and unique country. The same rules that apply for say, Finland, do not always apply to the US.
Our people are different. Our culture is different. Our attitude is difference. Our economy is different. And the purpose our country is different.
In the US, freedom comes before prosperity. Never forget that. That sounds a little weird to some, but it's what makes our country unique and great.
Funny how all the countries mentioned on those images are small, undiverse countries with little economic power or international responsibility.
The United States is a hugely diverse and unique country. The same rules that apply for say, Finland, do not always apply to the US.
Our people are different. Our culture is different. Our attitude is difference. Our economy is different. And the purpose our country is different.
In the US, freedom comes before prosperity. Never forget that. That sounds a little weird to some, but it's what makes our country unique and great.
Funny how all the countries mentioned on those images are small, undiverse countries with little economic power or international responsibility.
The United States is a hugely diverse and unique country. The same rules that apply for say, Finland, do not always apply to the US.
Our people are different. Our culture is different. Our attitude is difference. Our economy is different. And the purpose our country is different.
In the US, freedom comes before prosperity. Never forget that. That sounds a little weird to some, but it's what makes our country unique and great.