I disagree. I think they make it 3d because of the story and acting.they spend so much time on the 3D effects that they forget about the story and acting
Ugh, 3D? I feel like movies like this just have 3D thrown in to try to attract people for novelty, except they spend so much time on the 3D effects that they forget about the story and acting. Beowulf was a good example of that.
A bad movie with bad acting is one thing, but then a bad movie with bad acting and a 3D pointy object darting toward your face in every action scene makes it that much unbearable.
^ Like the 2008 "Rambo"?
Will there be a camel punch in this Conan? If yes I will watch.
Crom, I have never prayed to you before. I have no tongue for it. No one, not even you, will remember if we were good men or bad. Why we fought, or why we died. All that matters is that two stood against many. That's what's important! Valor pleases you, Crom... so grant me one request. Grant me revenge! And if you do not listen, then to HELL with you!
Be better if it was a donkey.
Anyways, This isn't a remake of Conan The Barbarian. This is based on a story from the comic books. It sounds like most of you don't really undestand just how long Conan has been around.Robert Howard wrote his 1st Conan story in 1932.
When are the idiots in Hollyweird going to learn that certain movies simply cannot and should not be remade?
Not gonna beat that in the new movie.