Society of Professional Journalists to campaign against illegal immigrants

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,647
10,507
136
Actually MSNBC does put a spin on things. For instance they fired anchors who were critical of Bush and the Iraq war, and pressured journalists not to be critical of the president when his approval ratings were high.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2008/05/29/yellin/print.html
[FONT=times new roman, times, serif][/FONT]edit: You added this after I posted



I'm sure if a memo was leaked from MSNBC instructing anchors and reporters to call the patriot act the police state act because its what the democrats wanted that would be totally cool right?

Many MSNBC haters don't seem to remember or know about that sad history of the network. Phil Donahue's show was cancelled in that time frame before it even got off the ground.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Another thing to keep in mind is it's not white Mexicans immigrating, after all they live good in Mexico but instead it's the indigenous immigrating, aka American Indian, one could claim they have rights to be here so it's controversial calling them illegal

It isn't their land, the land wasn't illegally taken, they can fuck off. They lost it fair and square. If they wanted it they should have fought harder for it in the past.
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
What part of ILLEGAL that those idiots don't understand?

Allow me: ILLEGAL = not legal = against the law = bad.

If Latinos think the term ILLEGAL is offensive to them, they are more than welcome to leave the US and tell those potential ILLEGALS/invading hordes to enter the US legally.
 
Last edited:

Gyhrg71

Member
Dec 8, 2010
145
0
0
You kidding? "Progressives" LOVE the war. Of course they don't want people to be critical of it. Seriously, the war is absolutely central to everything they're trying to do. Without the "war", there is no Patriot Act, there is no DHS, and there is no control over every aspect of our lives. The war is absolutely paramount. It must be there to keep the chattle in line...er, I mean, the people safe.

It doesn't make spin right. That said, though, people who watch Fox News and MSNBC know what they're getting. They watch it for a reason...namely, they watch it because it tells them what they want to hear. It's a TV station.

Yeah all those "no blood for oil protester" types really loved the war. I don't think you know what a progressive really is.

The point that sailed over your head was MSNBC doesn't represent a liberal view, its just corporate/government controlled media just like fox. They just advertise their product to a different demographic.

The DHS by the way was formed in 2002, when Bush was president and republicans controlled congress. Patriot act was passed even earlier. So as you pointed out before if you're going to point the finger at the progressives for DHS/Patriot Act (who exactly?) and say its part of some big plot you damn sure have to do the same to the other side and look at Republicans/Democrats.

And before you waste my time pointing out that a lot of democrats were involved in forming DHS and passing the Patriot Act, democrat /= liberal.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
"Undocumented" sounds more objective to me. "Illegal" implies guilt, and in this country we have a presumption of innocence.
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
You kidding? "Progressives" LOVE the war. Of course they don't want people to be critical of it. Seriously, the war is absolutely central to everything they're trying to do. Without the "war", there is no Patriot Act, there is no DHS, and there is no control over every aspect of our lives. The war is absolutely paramount. It must be there to keep the chattle in line...er, I mean, the people safe.
So in dreboland, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld et al were secret Progressives pushing their nefarious agenda?
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
What part of ILLEGAL that those idiots don't understand?

Allow me: ILLEGAL = not legal = against the law = bad.

If Latinos think the term ILLEGAL is offensive to them, they are more than welcome to leave the US and tell those potential ILLEGALS/invading hordes to enter the US legally.

Just pointing out that "Against the law" does not necessarily equate to "bad".

But that's another discussion altogether.
 

matt0611

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2010
1,879
0
0
"Undocumented" sounds more objective to me. "Illegal" implies guilt, and in this country we have a presumption of innocence.

Thats like saying we can't call people thieves or murderers because they are presumed innocent.

People can be assumed innocent about being an illegal immigrant, thats fine, but if you did, in fact, immigrate here illegally then you are an illegal immigrant.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
82,854
17,365
136
Just pointing out that "Against the law" does not necessarily equate to "bad".

But that's another discussion altogether.

No.
Having said that, I think illegal immigration is in fact, bad.
But your point is well made. If we are gonna hate on them for solid practical reasons, lets start listing them instead of just hating on them cuz they break laws.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,647
10,507
136
Thats like saying we can't call people thieves or murderers because they are presumed innocent.

People can be assumed innocent about being an illegal immigrant, thats fine, but if you did, in fact, immigrate here illegally then you are an illegal immigrant.

I wish I knew the numbers, and if the government had any, I'm sure they could only be estimates. Do people realize that alot of these illegals are children who's parents committed the illegal act. This was what the whole Dream act was about that the Republicans voted down. I personally think that the Republicans are demogoging on this and know damn well that they will not be sending out the cops and sending these people back to a country, they have nothing in common with.
 
Last edited:

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,999
1,396
126
Just pointing out that "Against the law" does not necessarily equate to "bad".

But that's another discussion altogether.

I know what you mean. If you are against "unjust" laws such as the old racist "whites only, no other colors allowed", then it is not bad.

But we are talking about <in this thread> breaking a "JUST" law. A law that any sovereign nations shall have the right to control its border and set it immigration policy. Breaking that law = bad. Period.

Oh, one more thing, there is no such thing as "undocumented immigrant". You are either LEGAL or ILLEGAL. Try to sneak in Mexico and call yourself "undocumented" and see how Mexican government would treat you.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Thats like saying we can't call people thieves or murderers because they are presumed innocent.

People can be assumed innocent about being an illegal immigrant, thats fine, but if you did, in fact, immigrate here illegally then you are an illegal immigrant.

Journalists say "ALLEGED thieves" and "ALLEGED murderers" until a person is convicted in court.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,252
9,319
146
...which has me scratching my head as to why the OP would even bother to post this bullshit.

It's Patranus, he's President of the Professional Society of Hack Posters.
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
Being a Latino the term "illegal immigrant" is not offensive it is accurate when describing people who have illegally crossed the border or over stayed their visit. What is truly offensive to me is a group pretending to represent me and others as if we were of all one mind.
 
Last edited:

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
Hey the problem of illegal aliens goes way beyong Latins. Here in the N.E we have a problem with Eastern Euros being here illegally, especially Russians (a major crime problem) and the former Slavic subjects. Then there's thje Roma. While not large as a group as a whole most of them seem to be engaged in activities against the law, just like they do where ever they reside.
 

drebo

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,035
1
81
Yeah all those "no blood for oil protester" types really loved the war. I don't think you know what a progressive really is.

The point that sailed over your head was MSNBC doesn't represent a liberal view, its just corporate/government controlled media just like fox. They just advertise their product to a different demographic.

The DHS by the way was formed in 2002, when Bush was president and republicans controlled congress. Patriot act was passed even earlier. So as you pointed out before if you're going to point the finger at the progressives for DHS/Patriot Act (who exactly?) and say its part of some big plot you damn sure have to do the same to the other side and look at Republicans/Democrats.

And before you waste my time pointing out that a lot of democrats were involved in forming DHS and passing the Patriot Act, democrat /= liberal.

Democrat != liberal just the same as Republican != conservative.

You seem to think that because I dislike our current progressive overlords, I must automatically like our previous liberal overlords. That couldn't be further from the truth.

Both were at fault, and unfortunately, the public doesn't have the stomach to kick all of those involved out. And by all, I mean ALL.

The DHS and Patriot Act are abortions of the Constitution. They need to be abolished. They are as unAmerican as it gets.

But, of course, with the "war" and all...we NEEEEEEEEEED them.

Bullshit, I say. Bullshit.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,511
1
81
Whereas we can see you are clearly accepting of those who think differently than you. Unlike the brainwashed liberals.



Yes, some people do claim that. I wonder why?

Your quote about telling them to use the term Government Option doesn't prove bias, infact, it shows that they wanted their reporters to call it what it is. GOVERNMENT mandated healthcare.
 

Gyhrg71

Member
Dec 8, 2010
145
0
0
Your quote about telling them to use the term Government Option doesn't prove bias, infact, it shows that they wanted their reporters to call it what it is. GOVERNMENT mandated healthcare.

How is calling it GOVERNMENT mandated healthcare anymore correct than calling it a Public Health Insurance Option? The Public Option would have given the public a second option for insurance instead of just private insurance. Just in case you're confused, what we got from Obamacare isn't the public option, Fox and the GOP did a great job of terrifying people of that with death panels and Government takeover of healthcare etc.

Top level Fox executives instructed their employees to call the Public Option (what its actually called - whether you agree with it or not) Government mandated healthcare, something Republican strategists discovered scared people.

But hey if think changing the names and terms to shape peoples opinions makes someone unbiased, then I guess SPJ is doing the right thing here by trying to get people to accept undocumented migrant workers right?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |