Really? You'd hold Christianity to account for the crimes of a couple of hundred people? So by that rationale would it be fair to say that Christians endorse paedophilia?
What about Christians in general, do they tolerate/endorse paedophilia, in your opinion?
I have no opinion one way or the other.
Make no mistake, I consider all religion to be a blight on the planet, with Islam being smelliest shit at, or near the bottom of the pile. I'll tolerate anyone who keeps their beliefs to themselves, and doesn't try to inflict them on others. Religion has no place in modern society, and when the actions of it's participants affects my life, it becomes my problem.
You basically said that a hundred so-called Muslims doing horrendous things in the name of their religion as the fault of that religion, but now you're not willing to go all the way to tar Christianity with the same brush, despite the fact that the so-called Muslims in question aren't in any way official representatives of their religion, but priests very definitely are and some of them have been kiddie-fiddling.
You really want to give law enforcement the power to be judge, jury and executioner?They really need to allow full on torture for scumbags like this, regardless of religion/race etc.
Diddling kids isn't anywhere in the doctrine, and AFAIK isn't taught in any church, mainstream or radical. They can still be blamed because it's tolerated though. That's an administrative issue, and not doctrinal.
Now switch "diddling kids" to "killing infidels", and "church" to "mosque". Does the same conclusion apply, or is it different? I'm pretty sure there's mosques that endorse spreading the religion at the point of a sword. THAT'S the difference
You really want to give law enforcement the power to be judge, jury and executioner?
Yikes. Who needs to worry about Islam when we're poisoning our own well.
They really need to allow full on torture for scumbags like this, regardless of religion/race etc..
If you are sick enough to be able to do something like this, you should be willing to accept the consequences of the same degree. Basically just put them in a cell and start chopping them up.
Maybe after word spreads that this is how it's handled we might have less of these occurrences.
I think it was shock and a "no, surely that didn't ACTUALLY happen" type thing that makes these lambs-to-the-slaughter type people walk around in a zombiefied state even while this guy is still wandering about with bloody hands and knives.what i dont understand is why no one tried to stop them or call the police or do anything besides watch... just my understanding from article above, but if true then WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!?!
About Islamic terrorism, has anyone done a proper examination of the casualties inflicted by terrorism (or some other useful metric) by different demographics, sorted by age, location, religion, wealth/poverty, happiness index, etc? It might turn out that Islamic terrorists just have really shitty cards dealt to them in terms of everything else, ruling out religion as a cause and more of a correlation.
Look at this silly cow standing in front of the guy with the knife:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ding-soldier-killer-police-arrived-scene.html
Do you seriously believe Islam is not a uniform? What of the hundreds of millions of peaceful Muslims around the world?
popo gave him and his friend the death penalty.
I wonder how long it took for the cops to get guns.
EDIT: About Islamic terrorism, has anyone done a proper examination of the casualties inflicted by terrorism (or some other useful metric) by different demographics, sorted by age, location, religion, wealth/poverty, happiness index, etc? It might turn out that Islamic terrorists just have really shitty cards dealt to them in terms of everything else, ruling out religion as a cause and more of a correlation.