We get it - typical woke liberal cancel culture rationale of "SOMEONE is saying SOMETHING that I DISAGREE WITH! Cancel them! Protest the platform! Silence anything that disagrees with me regardless of if it is factual or not!"
We get it - typical woke liberal cancel culture rationale of "SOMEONE is saying SOMETHING that I DISAGREE WITH! Cancel them! Protest the platform! Silence anything that disagrees with me regardless of if it is factual or not!"
Wut?
No offense OP because I include myself in my next statement.
Typical Liberal move waaaaay over thinking something minor.
If Joe Rogan wants to endorse Bernie who cares. Bernie’s job is not to fawn over an endorsement that is poisonous.
He graduated Harvard Law at age 23. Calling him an intellectual charlatan is foolish.
Ocasio-Cortez graduated cum laude from Boston University College of Arts and Sciences with a BA in 2011, majoring in international relations and economics
The news is that the LGBTBBQ community wants Bernie to disavow Joe's "endorsement"... which really wasn't an endorsement.
LGBT Rights Group Demands Sanders Renounce Rogan Endorsement
The Human Rights Campaign is calling on Bernie Sanders to renounce an endorsement from radio host Joe Rogan, who has made derogatory comments about African Americans and LGBTQ people.www.bloomberg.com
Are you saying that the "LGBTBBQ" community is not allowed to have this opinion?
Thank you for proving my earlier post correct.Where the hell am I suggesting that? How far up there do you have to be to suggest something so asinine ?
I'm in full support of giving people the ability (left and right) to look retarded in public.
This is basically you right now - suggesting things that are never stated in order to try to paint your own pictures.
But that's somehow different, says every bothsideser everywhere.Makes him sound about as qualified as Rachel Maddow
Rachel Maddow - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
or AOC
Snipped from Wikipedia
Graduating from an ivy league school doesn't make you honest, or qualified to speak with authority on every subject.
I call Shapiro and his kind intellectual charlatans because they dress ignorance and lies in the trappings of intellectualism. Shapiro sounds wise only if you've never seriously investigated what he's saying. He takes things out of context, distorts and makes basic factual errors; he'll directly contradict himself without a trace of irony. It's not clear to what degree he's purposefully misleading people versus simply being ignorant, but he certainly hopes you're not insightful enough to call him out on his bullshit.
I think it'd be more honest just to say you disagree with him ideologically.
That'd be a lot more respectful than calling a person with an obviously well-developed intellect an intellectual charlatan.
One doesn't have to agree with democrats to be an intellectual.
I see a guy that is what used to be called a Head, somebody cut off from his feelings and way way way up in his head, that is to say completely stoned. An interesting term that, maybe like having rocks in your head. Looks like sleepwalking to me, a mind without emotional feed back. Another great term that hits the spot, I think: Far Out!Like you I think he is ordinary racist, sexist, homophobic. He's no paragon of liberal virtue -- quite far from it. But he's not representing himself as that, and those things don't nullify the positive values he has which align with Bernie. It's a damn shame if we can't appreciate that. And it shouldn't stop us from calling out where Joe is racist, sexist, homophobic. It enhances those call-outs because someone who receives criticism from someone they recognize still values and respects them is much more likely to receive that feedback in a way which helps them challenge themselves. Moreover, it's just a more realistic standard to expect from ourselves and our neighbors.
The news is that the LGBTBBQ community wants Bernie to disavow Joe's "endorsement"... which really wasn't an endorsement.
LGBT Rights Group Demands Sanders Renounce Rogan Endorsement
The Human Rights Campaign is calling on Bernie Sanders to renounce an endorsement from radio host Joe Rogan, who has made derogatory comments about African Americans and LGBTQ people.www.bloomberg.com
I think it'd be more honest just to say you disagree with him ideologically. That'd be a lot more respectful than calling a person with an obviously well-developed intellect an intellectual charlatan.
One doesn't have to agree with democrats to be an intellectual.
I'm constantly wobbling between the centre-left and the actually-left left. I'm a wishy-washy liberal insofar as I don't want to take sides between them (the unfortunate truth is I agree with the negative things each say about the other, but...then what?)
It just seems to me that many centrists are constantly looking to pick fights with the left, almost as if they hate the left more than they do the right.
The behavior of the Lib Dems here is a case in point, and the snipes at Sanders from Clinton and some of her fans is another. Can you not just concentrate on the real threat right now?
The problem here seems to be you don't understand the word charlatan or how it is being used here. You seem to think people are using it to say Shapiro isn't really smart, that he is just faking it. That is not what is being said. People are saying he is a smart, lying sack of shit.I think it'd be more honest just to say you disagree with him ideologically. That'd be a lot more respectful than calling a person with an obviously well-developed intellect an intellectual charlatan.
One doesn't have to agree with democrats to be an intellectual.
The problem here seems to be you don't understand the word charlatan or how it is being used here. You seem to think people are using it to say Shapiro isn't really smart, that he is just faking it. That is not what is being said. People are saying he is a smart, lying sack of shit.
Yes but the point is that nobody is saying he isn't educated.The literal definition of a charlatan is someone falsely claiming to have special knowledge, so I would say it's a mixture of both. He doesn't know as much as he claims and he's using what intelligence he has to both cover that up and fool people into supporting him. Basically, instead of using his education to become genuinely well-informed and improve the world, he's using it as a weapon to pad his ego and bank account at the expense of suckers.
Specifically that one group, definitely not "the community". You can tell he's disingenuous because he's mocking us every time he references us.Was it all lesbians, gays, bisexuals.... who calling for this or some group?