Good enough for me.
If some supreme ruler decides I have to spend an eternity in a dimension filled with the more terrifying things in the world (or, at the minimum, in a dimension that is set apart from one of glorious awesomeness that others receive), all because I didn't bow down to his sorry ass, then he is far less than a benevolent being - I'd say such a being is actually the supreme asshole of the universe.
So such a thing created all of us - for what, his amusement? If we have to kneel and accept his position, and we are actually threatened/coerced into doing this or otherwise face certain doom for eternity... I raise the question, are we anything but a cosmic ant-farm?
I challenge any such being who transcends everything that ever existed and thus lives outside of everything that ever existed (hmm, how does that one work again?), can reason and logic that strives to better the populace of this ant-farm result ever result in praise?
Is this so wrong? I find no reason to accept any of this is the worst of anything other than nature, but I also find no fault in others finding reasons to believe otherwise. Spirituality has many bonuses that lend a hand in personal wellbeing, but organizing it disturbs me. Regardless, I'm stubborn and refuse to kneel to anything or anyone. If a creature claiming to be a divine deity appeared before me, I still wouldn't kneel, and further I'd dare to ask some important questions, mainly if any supposed historical accounts are factual - if answered in the affirmative, I'd look the creature in its eyes(?) and call it a self-serving asshole. Yes, I seriously would.
Otherwise, I completely support personal spirituality, and honestly wish I could take part. I try to fill in that gap with a spirituality of species progression, but it's tough turning that into an actual spiritual feeling, and thus doesn't hit the same notes in the brain.