NL5
Diamond Member
- Apr 28, 2003
- 3,287
- 12
- 81
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Would you trust the nurse if she said your balls needed to come off?
Depends, that's all I could see when I had crap ass HMO insurance.
Originally posted by: Slew Foot
Would you trust the nurse if she said your balls needed to come off?
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
Originally posted by: NL5
It is not a stupid analogy at all. Professional advice is professional advice, no? How are they different? She trusted PROFESSIONAL advice. Admittedly bad advice, but doctors do it all the time as well - nobody calls the patients "idiots".
again, if you'll get your leg amputated because of a scrape based on the professional advice of a doctor, i WILL call you an idiot.
and again, stupid analogy.
You are changing the analogy so as not to fit the original situation - bad professional advice, not ludicrous advice (they lady in the OP was fine making the payments for two years, it was the single piece of false advice that sunk her). Nobody is offering up an example of how they are different. How many years of schooling the professional has????? What about a civil engineer who has a BA, and comes out to your property and declares it is safe to build. Three years later, there is a landslide. Are you a moran for taking his advice? He has as much school as a typical mortgage broker. So what's the difference there?
The difference is that you still cannot spell "moron"
It's a joke - I guess in your infinite wisdom you missed that, and the "wink" after it the first time. You get on the internets much?
Do a search just in ATOT for "moran". You'll get a million threads. Old and tired joke, but one that should have been readily obvious. I think Engineer caught it.
Originally posted by: neodyn55
that being said, she's paying the price (no pun intended) for her mistakes anyway so there's probably no point in chastising her further.
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
i'm changing the analogy as much as you are... ability to afford a house compared to treatment of cancer.
yet you continue to make the ludicrous analogies.
civil engineer and building foundations now? fine, i'll play with that one too.
if a civil engineer tells me it's safe to build the next Twin Towers on top of some swamp land in Florida, and I agree to it, then yes i am an IDIOT.
You are changing bad advice into utterly ludicrous advice. Period. Bad analogy.
Originally posted by: NL5
I think Engineer caught it.
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: NL5
I think Engineer caught it.
I assumed that was what the was for, otherwise, I would have flamed away! :laugh:
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
i'm changing the analogy as much as you are... ability to afford a house compared to treatment of cancer.
yet you continue to make the ludicrous analogies.
civil engineer and building foundations now? fine, i'll play with that one too.
if a civil engineer tells me it's safe to build the next Twin Towers on top of some swamp land in Florida, and I agree to it, then yes i am an IDIOT.
You are changing bad advice into utterly ludicrous advice. Period. Bad analogy.
as much as you are comparing heeding blatantly obvious bad advice ($25k income $500k house) to sound advice (cancer, building foundations).
i don't think you are getting the point so i'll bold it for you.
she should have had enough common sense to see that it was not something she could afford. i don't care what the RE agent and lenders told her. it does not take a genius to figure this part out.
she did not so therefore she is an idiot and i'll continue to call her one.
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
i'm changing the analogy as much as you are... ability to afford a house compared to treatment of cancer.
yet you continue to make the ludicrous analogies.
civil engineer and building foundations now? fine, i'll play with that one too.
if a civil engineer tells me it's safe to build the next Twin Towers on top of some swamp land in Florida, and I agree to it, then yes i am an IDIOT.
You are changing bad advice into utterly ludicrous advice. Period. Bad analogy.
as much as you are comparing heeding blatantly obvious bad advice ($25k income $500k house) to sound advice (cancer, building foundations).
i don't think you are getting the point so i'll bold it for you.
she should have had enough common sense to see that it was not something she could afford. i don't care what the RE agent and lenders told her. it does not take a genius to figure this part out.
she did not so therefore she is an idiot and i'll continue to call her one.
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: BlahBlahYouToo
i'm changing the analogy as much as you are... ability to afford a house compared to treatment of cancer.
yet you continue to make the ludicrous analogies.
civil engineer and building foundations now? fine, i'll play with that one too.
if a civil engineer tells me it's safe to build the next Twin Towers on top of some swamp land in Florida, and I agree to it, then yes i am an IDIOT.
You are changing bad advice into utterly ludicrous advice. Period. Bad analogy.
as much as you are comparing heeding blatantly obvious bad advice ($25k income $500k house) to sound advice (cancer, building foundations).
i don't think you are getting the point so i'll bold it for you.
she should have had enough common sense to see that it was not something she could afford. i don't care what the RE agent and lenders told her. it does not take a genius to figure this part out.
she did not so therefore she is an idiot and i'll continue to call her one.
No, NL5 has been spot on correct during this entire thread. You can call her an idiot as much as you like but the bottom line is that she is not required to be a professional lender any more than we are required to be professional doctors. We pay these people to be the professionals for us when we need them and we expect to be protected by the government if they screw us over, give us bad advise, or purposely take advantage of us by being able to feed us crap that is not true and we cannot tell the difference because we are not professionals.
The main difference between the professional doctor and the professional lender is that doctors are much more vulnerable to lawsuits if they screw up thanks to the rules and regulations provided by our government in order to ensure quality. In the case of the lenders, there are not nearly as much regulations in place as their needs to be and you know what is going to happen now? Now, people like you and I are going to end up bailing out the country with our tax dollars whether we like it or not. It all could have been prevented if we hadn't relaxed regulations.
With that, I will ask you one question. How many multi billion dollar housing bailouts and economic disasters in this country will it take for you to believe that we need much stricter regulations because these lenders should take most of the blame? How many?
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
I went ahead and fixed that for you.
We had decent regulations in place, until they were relaxed to allow people *that otherwise couldn't afford home ownership* to become homeowners. It's the governments fault for relaxing those regulations, which in turn allowed lenders to become more predatory, which in turn let people that couldn't be homeowners previously get loans for houses they couldn't afford (and wouldn't have been approved for if the regs weren't relaxed).
We could have still had this "housing bubble" if they hadn't changed the lending laws, but it for sure wouldn't have been as major. It would have been more like a "normal" recession, instead of this complete sh!tstorm we are in currently.
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Listen all you bleeding hearts, it does not matter if we are talking about a bank, a realtor, a doctor, a nurse, a teacher or any other professional...NO ONE...I repeat...NO ONE will have your best interest more at heart than you....not even mommy.
If you blindly follow the advice of ANYONE for ANYTHING and take their word as gospel without doing some investigating on your own so you don't get burned....fuck you...you get everything coming to you.
Is it that hard to write down some goddamned questions and seek second opinions?
When people get off their asses and quit putting their well being in the hands of others who don't give 2 shits on if you live or die, succeed or fail, this country will be a lot better off.
Originally posted by: Xavier434
No, NL5 has been spot on correct during this entire thread. You can call her an idiot as much as you like but the bottom line is that she is not required to be a professional lender any more than we are required to be professional doctors. We pay these people to be the professionals for us when we need them and we expect to be protected by the government if they screw us over, give us bad advise, or purposely take advantage of us by being able to feed us crap that is not true and we cannot tell the difference because we are not professionals.
The main difference between the professional doctor and the professional lender is that doctors are much more vulnerable to lawsuits if they screw up thanks to the rules and regulations provided by our government in order to ensure quality. In the case of the lenders, there are not nearly as much regulations in place as their needs to be and you know what is going to happen now? Now, people like you and I are going to end up bailing out the country with our tax dollars whether we like it or not. It all could have been prevented if we had stricter regulations and stricter quality assurance.
With that, I will ask you one question. How many multi billion dollar housing bailouts and economic disasters in this country will it take for you to believe that we need much stricter regulations because these lenders should take most of the blame? How many?
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Listen all you bleeding hearts, it does not matter if we are talking about a bank, a realtor, a doctor, a nurse, a teacher or any other professional...NO ONE...I repeat...NO ONE will have your best interest more at heart than you....not even mommy.
If you blindly follow the advice of ANYONE for ANYTHING and take their word as gospel without doing some investigating on your own so you don't get burned....fuck you...you get everything coming to you.
Is it that hard to write down some goddamned questions and seek second opinions?
When people get off their asses and quit putting their well being in the hands of others who don't give 2 shits on if you live or die, succeed or fail, this country will be a lot better off.
It's not that black and white. You do not need to follow a professional's advice blindly in order for something really bad to happen as a result of missing just one important detail or to be misinformed during your own research. This is why professionals exist in the first place. This is why we pay them. If doing it ourselves were easy and the margin of error were small then these people wouldn't have a job.
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Listen all you bleeding hearts, it does not matter if we are talking about a bank, a realtor, a doctor, a nurse, a teacher or any other professional...NO ONE...I repeat...NO ONE will have your best interest more at heart than you....not even mommy.
If you blindly follow the advice of ANYONE for ANYTHING and take their word as gospel without doing some investigating on your own so you don't get burned....fuck you...you get everything coming to you.
Is it that hard to write down some goddamned questions and seek second opinions?
When people get off their asses and quit putting their well being in the hands of others who don't give 2 shits on if you live or die, succeed or fail, this country will be a lot better off.
It's not that black and white. You do not need to follow a professional's advice blindly in order for something really bad to happen as a result of missing just one important detail or to be misinformed during your own research. This is why professionals exist in the first place. This is why we pay them. If doing it ourselves were easy and the margin of error were small then these people wouldn't have a job.
Originally posted by: Wheezer
a few key punches in a calculator would tell you that ona 25k salary you CANNOT afford a 500k home.
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: Wheezer
a few key punches in a calculator would tell you that ona 25k salary you CANNOT afford a 500k home.
No shit.
Did you read the article? Most people have more income than just a salary. She had substantially more. You must have missed that part.
Also, everybody saying having renters is no guarantee of income - do you think any source of income is guaranteed? If you do, there is a very good chance that sometime in your life you will get one hellava eyeopener. My rental income has been substantially more reliable than my income from actually working. (thank god for that)
I can't imagine a world like you are wishing for. You talk about responsibility, in your dream world nobody has ANY. That would be swell - personally, I'm all for it - not very noble, but in a no rule contest for survival of the fittest, screw everybody in your path kinda world, I'd be at the top.
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: neodyn55
that being said, she's paying the price (no pun intended) for her mistakes anyway so there's probably no point in chastising her further.
She's paying the price? LOL, you and I will be paying the price in the form of a big ole taxpayer bailout of the banking and lending institutions. And to put no blame on the mortgage professionals is complete short sighted, IMO.
Originally posted by: NL5
Originally posted by: Wheezer
a few key punches in a calculator would tell you that ona 25k salary you CANNOT afford a 500k home.
No shit.
Did you read the article? Most people have more income than just a salary. She had substantially more. You must have missed that part.
Also, everybody saying having renters is no guarantee of income - do you think any source of income is guaranteed? If you do, there is a very good chance that sometime in your life you will get one hellava eyeopener. My rental income has been substantially more reliable than my income from actually working. (thank god for that)
I can't imagine a world like you are wishing for. You talk about responsibility, in your dream world nobody has ANY. That would be swell - personally, I'm all for it - not very noble, but in a no rule contest for survival of the fittest, screw everybody in your path kinda world, I'd be at the top.
she makes $25,000 a year at the factory
She and one daughter split the two bedrooms upstairs, while her older daughter lived on the ground floor with her husband and two young children. With her daughters each paying $1,500, she could cover the remaining $1,100.