Dannar26: Mr. Beam. I am a sufferer of the aforementioned "disease. " I know many of "us" take you to be a troll, but I'm not assuming that. I'm not trying to be insulting either. I'm genuinely curious as to your methods of furthering harmony of mankind.
M: It is such a pleasure to find at least one person of a conservative nature who can express himself with intelligence and reason. It would seem to me that in your very capacity to ask heart felt questions lies the only hope I can see. But notice that you alone so far here stand on top of what is basically a pile of immature and childish reactions, the reactions of folk who can't be depended on to reason. I only suggest that it is important that somehow we find a way to cure the CBD. I don't have too many ideas as to how that can be done. One thought is that because conservatives deflect truth that damages their egos that we destroy the pretext that they are anything but shameful. The profound need to protect themselves from feeling they are disgusting exists because it is exactly how they unconsciously feel and want to keep that realization our of consciousness. The result of course, is that they actually act disgusting. Take Bober's post here as an example. He's stuck at the kindergarten fear he will poopoo in class stage.
D: It's a nice idea, but you can't just take a step back from the world's woes and proclaim yourself above them.
M: What may appear to be stepping back would be hard to separate from an acceptance of fact if conservative brains actually prove to be hopelessly lost to reality. Science has no answer to this.
D: Moonie, if somebody physically attacked you, what would you do? Do you presume that all civilized areas entail equal safety, be they main street, ghetto, or redneck woodlands? Would you worry if any of those areas spread?
M: I am not important but I don't seem to have a typical liberal brain. In almost every area of political and philosophical thought I always come down on some third way, a synthesis of liberal conservative thinking at what I call a higher level of understanding. I am not as hard on liberals as I am on conservatives, focusing on the latter because they can't be reached by reason if their ego gets involved. Liberals tend to be able to be reached by reason regardless of the consequence. They don't have the CBD to the same degree.
D: Readiness, or as you call it "low level" paranoia is still useful. Danger isn't eradicated from this world. I think you'll agree we're not even close to that point.
M: Totally agree. I have also stated over and over that when there is a real external threat liberals and conservatives work with synergy when playing in the same league. It is only when no threat exists that the conservative brain works overtime to fantasize one into existence and thereby make it real. It is this that is defective.
D; The way you wield that accusation reminds of the internet kiddie "u mad bro?" taunt. Because we give a nod towards being security minded, we are somehow wrong. It's sorta like you're saying it's fucked to care...a classic adolescent take on the world.
M: It would be hard to distinguish it's fucked to care and it's fucked to care about delusions, when we haven't established the reality of the threat.
D: I care about people, and I care about progress. I don't want to trash the environment, I want society to be respectful and clean, and I certainly have no deep abiding love for the wealthy elite. I want us to figure out fusion energy, break through the inherent barriers of CMOS technology, and take to the stars. But how do we get there?
M: Me too. What you are arguing against here is your conception of what a liberal is. Both liberals and conservatives are moral and have morality based ideologies. They differ in moral emphasis and the number of moral concerns they focus on. Conservatives, generally, place moral relevance on things like group loyalty, purity, respect for authority, etc, that liberals do not, the latter placing more moral weight on fairness and equality than conservatives do.
D: I believe in tough love. I'm a parent, and I realize that coddling you child isn't always the answer. You have to motivate people to succeed. You have to not fear failure, and become resilient to it.
M: Liberals care about their children too. What you emphasize is important in a world that is competitive and competition is hate. I prefer a world that is not based on competition but cooperation among all people. I am communal in my thinking. Conservatives are focused on individualism and the self and the more the world looks like the world that creates, the more one needs to be that way, creating a more and more cutthroat world, divided by nation class and race, etc. What you are hoping for is being better adapted to a sick system.
D: It's these lessons we need to put forth into society as a whole. It's a waste of time cleaning up after adult children; teach them and motivate them to do it themselves! It's the only way we can advance forward and crush ignorance.
M: Yes, but we obviously differ on what we define as ignorance.
D: How are conservatives stopping this? How can they imorove? How will their changing help society as a whole? Why should I care to change my view?
M: Knowledge is power. The only way I can see change happening is by understanding why we don't want to change. How do you get a drunk to stop drinking. Ultimately life deals a kick in the face that can't be rationalized away, I guess. Sad no? I hope for more.
D: EDIT/EXCUSE: Smart phone typing.[/QUOTE]
Not a problem at all. I empathize. When I make a mistake on my phone posting here, I get constant ridicule from some tree swinger who hasn't much else to offer.
Thank you again for asking intelligent questions and putting up heart felt critiques. What a pleasure.....
I forgot that D followed by a colon equals D: