Someone finally figured out who killed OJ's ex-wife.

[MrColin]

http://www.businessinsider.com/oj-simpson-murders-2012-4#

I know most of you assumed OJ was guilty because he's black and only got off because he had so much money to spend. They couldn't provide evidence that he did it because he didn't do it. He only survived the LAPD railroad because of his money.

 

[boomerang]

OJ, isn't he the guy that's in prison now?

 

[randomrogue]

What do you mean you KNOW most of us assumed his color had anything to do with this?

Stop using the race card.

 

[IamDavid]

http://www.businessinsider.com/oj-simpson-murders-2012-4#

I know most of you assumed OJ was guilty because he's black and only got off because he had so much money to spend. They couldn't provide evidence that he did it because he didn't do it. He only survived the LAPD railroad because of his money.

lol, OJ fanboy? Haven't seen one of them before.
He did it, he even admitted it. Its over. Let him die in jail.

 

[tw1164]

He put the murder's picture right on the cover.

 

[AyashiKaibutsu]

If OJ Simpson was a bus driver instead of a famous football player, he wouldn't be known as OJ Simpson; he'd now be known as Orenthal the bus driving murderer (stolen from some black comedian).

 

[BudAshes]

mind=blown

 

[Geosurface]

Why is a story from April being posted like it's new?

Secondly, the private detective guy who published this book in April actually tried to get the same basic theory in another book published back in the 90's or maybe 2000.

I saw an excellent story which tore him and his credibility apart. It's just his little pet theory, and nowhere in his book does he account for the BLOOD EVIDENCE in any way, he just simply ignores it.

The blood evidence proves OJ did it.

But if you can get some attention and book sales with a crazy theory that most people writing let alone reading articles about it won't ever delve into the details of let alone find out the faults in, hey, why not? That OJ story still had a little bit of cash left in it to squeeze out I guess. But you sure as hell weren't going to squeeze it out without some eye-catching new hook, like that OJ didn't do it.

He did.

 

[Lemon law]

Oh well, another conspiracy theory, gotta be a dime a dozen by now. Still waiting for Sarah Palin to set us all straight when she comes back riding astride a hungry T-rex. I will be overwhelmed then, but for now, color me underwhelmed.

 

[MrColin]

Why is a story from April being posted like it's new?

Secondly, the private detective guy who published this book in April actually tried to get the same basic theory in another book published back in the 90's or maybe 2000.

I saw an excellent story which tore him and his credibility apart. It's just his little pet theory, and nowhere in his book does he account for the BLOOD EVIDENCE in any way, he just simply ignores it.

The blood evidence proves OJ did it.

But if you can get some attention and book sales with a crazy theory that most people writing let alone reading articles about it won't ever delve into the details of let alone find out the faults in, hey, why not? That OJ story still had a little bit of cash left in it to squeeze out I guess. But you sure as hell weren't going to squeeze it out without some eye-catching new hook, like that OJ didn't do it.

He did.

Jason, who was never tested, would have left blood that would have matched partially with OJ's. Also, as presented the blood evidence didn't prove shit:

There were five blood drops at Brown's home containing DNA that matched Simpson's, four were located on the walkway and the fifth blood drop was found in the driveway. The blood drops on the walkway began near the murder victims, to the left of the bloody footprints leading away from Brown's home and continued past the rear gate and into the driveway. The location of the blood drops indicated that they were shed by the killer, who was bleeding drops to the ground as he left the scene of the crime, heading from the walkway to the rear gate and then the driveway.

The DNA analysis on the blood drops was conducted by the LAPD lab, Cellmark (a private lab in Maryland), and the California Department of Justice Lab. All three labs independently found that the DNA in the blood drops matched Simpson's DNA. A RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism analysis) was done from a blood drop found on the driveway that was large enough to be tested on through the procedure. This procedure produced a 1in 170 million match of Simpson's DNA to the DNA in the driveway. The other four blood drops were tested by PCR testing (Polymerase Chain Reaction). There was a 1 in 5,200 match on the fifth.
These five drops were among the most powerful evidence against Simpson because they represented the DNA evidence least persuasively contested by the defense. Criminalists collected the blood on June 13, 1994, prior to the time, when the police first obtained a sample of Simpson's blood. This meant that any police tampering would have involved not simply planting the evidence but substituting the evidence and it would have had to have taken police while the drops were in the custody of police criminalists. This substitution would most likely had to have taken place between the collection of the blood drops on June 13th and DNA analysis of the blood drops on June 14th at the LAPD lab. Blood smudges were found on the packaging of one of the five blood drops. This indicated that the pieces of cotton (swatches) on which the blood drop had been collected were wet when placed inside their packaging. The swatches, left to dry on June 13th, had more than adequate time to dry before they were placed in the packaging on June 14th, so a stain from wet material, when the material should have been dry, raised questions. Something wrong happened or has happened whether the evidence was tampered with or was contaminated. It was argued that the swatches might have been switched. One criminalist testified that she placed her initials on the packaging containing the swatches, but no initials were found. Besides, swatches like those on which the blood was collected were distributed to detectives for purposes of evidence collection, so that a detective intent on switching the swatches would have had the material to work with swatches to wet with blood.
Evidence could have been more than deliberately removed and replaced; it was also argued that lab procedures had so thoroughly contaminated the blood evidence that any DNA analysis of the blood would be unreliable. Extremely serious patterns of contamination in the LAPD's PCR analysis were found in other tests. The RFLP result matching Simpson from the driveway might have been contaminated, although that test was much less vulnerable to contamination than PCR. Also, the DNA analyst for the LAPD contaminated the blood drops found at the crime scene while preparing them for DNA analysis on June 14th, after getting blood from Simpson's voluntarily given sample on his lab gloves.

source: http://www.bxscience.edu/publications/forensics/articles/dna/r-dna02.htm

 

[Phokus]

If the glove don't fit you must acquit

 

[Geosurface]

Five reasons we know OJ did it from http://newsone.com/1334425/five-reasons-why-we-know-o-j-did-it/

1. DNA — The prosecution of Simpson’s case presented compelling DNA evidence, including matching bloody footprints, hair follicles and a glove found near Simpson’s home containing blood that tested positive to the blood of Goldman. Blood was also found in Simpson’s Ford Bronco near the driver’s outside door handle. Other blood samples were smeared inside on the console, door, steering wheel and carpeting. DNA tests showed some of the blood consisted of a mixture of Simpson’s genetic markers and the victims.

2. THE INFAMOUS CAR CHASE — On the day of his arrest, the LAPD chased Simpson in his white Bronco for hours. To top it off, the spectacle was all caught on tape. What fool in his right mind would run from the police if he’s “innocent?”

3. CHANGE OF ALIBI — O.J.’s initial alibi was that he was asleep at the time of the murder. His defense later changed that alibi with a series of stories, one of which claiming he was hitting golf balls outside his home. Simpson’s defense also claimed a neighbor’s housekeeper, Rosa Lopez, saw his car parked outside the home. However, Lopez later confessed during cross-examination that she could not be precisely sure whether or not his Bronco was outside the home.

4. MOTIVE — According to the prosecution, Simpson had plenty motive for killing his ex-wife. Simpson was reportedly prone to jealous rages (evidenced by taped 911 calls from Nicole herself), including allegedly hitting, stalking, and degrading her — all signs that he was quite capable of murder.

5. THE “IF I DID IT” BOOK — There’s no greater way to say “I’m guilty” than to publish a book detailing how you would hypothetically do it, all in the name of profit. An excerpt from the book reads:
“If I had actually done it… I would have brought my good gloves that day. I would have thought it was shame they shrunk when I left them out on the patio, but I would have brought them just the same. They were my lucky gloves, and I would have needed them cause I was going to stab my slut of a wife… hypothetically.”

And some other better ones:

http://pages.infinit.net/reparvit/nicole12.html

Remember, OJ had a nasty gash on his hand he was very evasive about.

The most definitive thing though is Nicole and Goldman's blood in HIS TRUCK.

That's the most clear reason to know he's guilty, the victim's blood in his car. The gash on his hand.

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/04/oj_simpson_bill_dear_full_of_it.php

 

[Matt1970]

OJ said he would dedicate the rest of his life in search of the real killer. He chased lead after lead at every golf course you could imagine.

 

[SheHateMe]

Ultimately he got busted for stealing towels from a hotel, I believe.

 

[Sonikku]

5. THE “IF I DID IT” BOOK — There’s no greater way to say “I’m guilty” than to publish a book detailing how you would hypothetically do it, all in the name of profit. An excerpt from the book reads:
“If I had actually done it… I would have brought my good gloves that day. I would have thought it was shame they shrunk when I left them out on the patio, but I would have brought them just the same. They were my lucky gloves, and I would have needed them cause I was going to stab my slut of a wife… hypothetically.”

Let's read that again.

5. THE “IF I DID IT” BOOK — There’s no greater way to say “I’m guilty” than to publish a book detailing how you would hypothetically do it, all in the name of profit. An excerpt from the book reads:
“If I had actually done it… I would have brought my good gloves that day. I would have thought it was shame they shrunk when I left them out on the patio, but I would have brought them just the same. They were my lucky gloves, and I would have needed them cause I was going to stab my slut of a wife… hypothetically.”

Hypothetically. As in, in theory, but not really in real life.

Also, it is a fact that OJ was considered for the part of the Terminator but Cameron opted for Arnold instead, believing audiences would not find OJ to be a believable killer.

Are you saying you know better than James Cameron?

 

[Triumph]

http://www.businessinsider.com/oj-simpson-murders-2012-4#

I know most of you assumed OJ was guilty because he's black and only got off because he had so much money to spend. They couldn't provide evidence that he did it because he didn't do it. He only survived the LAPD railroad because of his money.

His son did it? Ok good, so a black person is still responsible for it. That proves my racist preconceptions of who commits murders.

 

[EXman]

If the glove don't fit you must acquit

Johnny took the glove to lunch and modified it. Didn't you know?

 

[EXman]

His son did it? Ok good, so a black person is still responsible for it. That proves my racist preconceptions of who commits murders.

So are you saying a Black person did not kill OJ's wife? Murderers commit murders. The color of their skin is red after the blood flows.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

His son did it? Ok good, so a black person is still responsible for it. That proves my racist preconceptions of who commits murders.

He is a believer in the Flying Spaghetti Monster of Conspiracies. It's a select cult.

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

There's an interesting documentary about this theory, The Overlooked Suspect, that I found pretty compelling, to the point that I might have found reasonable doubt if I had been a juror and this theory were presented. I still think it's very likely OJ committed the murders, but this is a fairly credible alternative theory.