Originally posted by: nCred
Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: JDub02
Would someone care to explain to me what makes creation any less valid than evolution?
I'm not arguing religious semantics. I'm saying some unnamed higher power creating us as opposed to billions of years of random chance turning mud into people.
There are no proof or even a theory to support it and just the thought itself is weird.
Creation of the world:
Nothing > nothing > 'poof' > the world we see today.
But isnt that what the Big Bang theory also says.. nothing at all > bang > billions of galaxies and so on.
No, that's not it. Like all scientific theories, the Big Bang doesn't attempt to explain most of the world that we see today, but instead explains parts of what we see in quantifiable, testable details. For example, the Big Bang explains why other galaxies are receding from us at the rates they are, the existence of the cosmic microwave background radiation, and the abundances of light elements such as hydrogen, helium, and lithium.
However, the world we see today includes the Earth, a dense object consisting mostly of heavy elements produced long after the Big Bang through stellar nucleosynthesis, and that's a completely different theory, and the development of life on Earth is dealt with by yet another theory, and so forth.